Subjective Collective Will In the Management of Shared Agricultural Land and Its Consequences
Abstract
A new stage in the development of relations in the management of agricultural land plots has replaced the initial privatization of agricultural land. Its difference is the change in the composition of the participants in the share ownership and the presence of economically strong economic counterparties-tenants of land. The composition of new owners is socially heterogeneous and, as a result, it does not have a legal instrument allowing to form the collective will of the general meeting according to the goals of property management, since the heterogeneity of the composition prevents the emergence of the possibility of unity of management goals. The expression of subjective collective will must have a legal instrument to prevent the possibility of its usurpation by an economically strong subject. It seems that such an instrument should be the differentiation of the types of disputes related to the formation of collective will on the management of common ownership and the procedural peculiarities of their resolution.
About the Author
V. A. Mayboroda
North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Laws, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Labor Law,
retired judge of the Tula Regional Court
References
1. Gray K. J., Gray S. F. Elements of Land Law. 4th ed. OUP, 2005.
2. Nygh P. Autonomy in International Contracts. Oxford, 1999.
3. Pound R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. 1922. Reprinted by The Lawbook Exchange Ltd. 2008.
4. Roth G. H., Kindler P. The Spirit of Corporate Law. Core Principles of Corporate Law in Continental Europe. Munchen, 2013.
5. Laptev V. A. Decisions of meetings and transactions: legal regime and differences [Resheniya sobraniy i sdelki: pravovoy rezhim i otlichiya] // Lawyer. [Yurist] 2016. N 2. P. 30–37.
6. Lipsky S. A. The legal mechanism of state regulation of market turnover of agricultural land in modern Russia: features of formation, trends and prospects [Pravovoy mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya rynochnogo oborota zemel’ sel’skokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya v sovremennoy Rossii: osobennosti formirovaniya, tendentsii i perspektivy] // Law and Economics. [Pravo i ekonomika.] 2011. N 12. P. 18–24.
7. Mayboroda V. A. Withdrawal of land for public needs [Iz”yatiye zemel’nykh uchastkov dlya publichnykh nuzhd // Pravovyye voprosy nedvizhimosti.] // Legal issues of real estate. 2015. N 1. P. 28–32.
8. Mayboroda V. A. Inheritance of land share by a foreign citizen [Nasledovaniye zemel’noy doli inostrannym grazhdaninom] // Inheritance law. 2018. N 3. P. 18–23.
9. Mayboroda V. A. On the possibility of notarization of decisions of equity owners of agricultural land plots [O vozmozhnosti notarial’nogo udostovereniya resheniy dolevykh sobstvennikov zemel’nykh uchastkov sel’skokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya] // Judge. [Sud’ya] 2015. N 12. P. 29–32.
10. Mayboroda V. A. The provision of public property land on the basis of the auction [Predostavleniye zemel’ publichnoy sobstvennosti na osnove auktsiona] // Lawyer. [Yurist.] 2015. N 19. P. 40–46.
11. Mayboroda V. A. Prevention of land disputes as an element of strategic planning for the development of a municipal district [Profilaktika zemel’nykh sporov kak element strategicheskogo planirovaniya razvitiya munitsipal’nogo rayona] // Municipal Service: legal issues. 2016. N 4. P. 25–29.
12. Mayboroda V. A. The development of the law enforcement function of the notary in transactions with land plots [Razvitiye pravookhranitel’noy funktsii notariata v sdelkakh s zemel’nymi uchastkami] // Notary. 2015. N 6. P. 41–44.
13. Filipenko N. V. Legal personality of social communities illustrated by the practice of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation // Zakon. 2017. N 4. P. 141–150.
14. Yampolskya Ts. A. On the concept of public organizations in the USSR // Questions of the theory and history of public organizations. M., 1971.
Review
For citations:
Mayboroda V.A. Subjective Collective Will In the Management of Shared Agricultural Land and Its Consequences. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2019;(1):69-76.
Views:
446
Email this article 