Dihotomy of Law: Historical Analysis, Current Trends, a Combination of Private and Public Principles in Civil Law
Abstract
The article is devoted to the perception of private and public law in the tradition of the Romano-German legal family. With the use of formal-logical, sociological-legal and retrospective methods of research the author studies the transformation of views on the grounds of differentiation of private and public law, analyzes the current trends in the development of scientific thought on the problem of dichotomy of law, the combination of private and public principles in civil law is studied. The conclusion is made about the development of two interrelated processes in the modern legal systems of Russia and Europe — “publicization” of private law and “commercialization” of public law.
About the Author
M. V. Tregubov
North-West Institute of Management — Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of Jurisprudence,
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Agarkov M. М. Value of Private Law [Tsennost’ Chastnogo Prava] // Jurisprudence [Pravovedeniye]. 1992. № 1. P. 25–41. (in rus.)
2. Anisimov A. P. Civil Law of Russia. The general part: a textbook for academic bachelor [Grazhdanskoye pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata] / A. P. Anisimov, A. Ya. Ryzhenkov, S. A. Charkin; under total ed. A. Ya. Ryzhenkova. 4th ed., revised and enlarged edition M. : [Yurayt]. 2016. 394 p. (in rus.)
3. Golubtsov V. G. The Ratio of Public and Private Law in Russia: the Historical Aspect [Sootnosheniye publichnogo i chastnogo prava v Rossii: istoricheskiy aspekt] // Perm University Herald. Yuridical scinces [Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskiye nauki]. 2008. № 1 (1). P. 57–62. (in rus.)
4. Berman G. J. Law and Revolution: the Formation of the Western Legal Tradition [Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya] / Trans. from Eng. 2nd ed. M. : Moscow State University Publishing House: INFRA-MNORM Publishing Group. 1998. 624 p.
5. Vasiliev O. D. Problems of Separation of the Right to Public and Private in the Russian Positivistic Theory of Law in the Late XIX — early XX centuries.: Dis. of Cand. legal sciences.[ Problemy razdeleniya prava na publichnoye i chastnoye v russkoy pozitivistskoy teorii prava v kontse XIX — nachale XX vv.: dis. kand. yurid. nauk.] Blagoveshchensk. 1999. 142 p. (in rus.)
6. Duguit L. General Transformations of Civil Law from the Time of Napoleon’s Code / ed. and with foreword: A. G. Goyhbarg, Trans from fr.: M. M. Sievers. M. : State. publishing house [Gos. izd-vo] 1919. 110 p.
7. Kavelin K. D. Civil Law. History of the Russian judicial system [Grazhdanskoye pravo. Istoriya russkogo sudoustroystva]. M. : [Yurayt]. 2018. 257 p. (in rus.)
8. Korkunov M. N. Course of lectures. SPb. [Kurs lektsiy. SPb.] / Legal Center-Press[Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press]. 2004. 458 p. (in rus.)
9. Korshunov N. M. Convergence of Private and Public Law: Problems of Theory and Practice: a monograph [Konvergentsiya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: problemy teorii i praktiki: monografiya]. M. : Norma: INFRA-M. 2015. 240 p. (in rus.)
10. Bogdanov E. The Ratio of Private and Public in Civil Legislation [Sootnosheniye chastnogo i publichnogo v grazhdanskom zakonodatel’stve] // Russian justice [Rossiyskaya yustitsiya]. 2000. № 4. P. 23–24. (in rus.)
11. Solodovnichenko T. A. Critical Assessment of the Theory of Convergence of Private and Public Law [Kriticheskaya otsenka teorii konvergentsii chastnogo i publichnogo prava] // Herald of OMSK University. Series: Right [Vestnik OmGU. Seriya: Pravo]. 2018. № 2 (55). P. 37–39. (in rus.)
12. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Public Law. Textbook [Publichnoye pravo. Uchebnik]. M. : BEC. 1995. 496 p. (in rus.)
13. Cherepakhin B. B. On the Issue of Private and Public Law [K voprosu o chastnom i publichnom prave] // X sb. works of professors and teachers of the Irkutsk State. University [X cb. trudov professorov i prepodavateley Irkutskogo gos. un-ta]. Irkutsk, 1926. P. 8–35. (in rus.)
Review
For citations:
Tregubov M.V. Dihotomy of Law: Historical Analysis, Current Trends, a Combination of Private and Public Principles in Civil Law. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2019;(1):50-57.
Views:
1312
Email this article 