Humane and Moral Attitude of People to the Animals and Norms-Principles of Russian legislation: Philosophical and Legal Analysis

Introduction: In Russian legal scholarship, issues of humane and moral treatment of animals remain insufficiently studied, despite the fact that corresponding requirements are enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, presidential decrees, and legislation. The absence of clear legal definitions of “humaneness” and “morality” complicates law enforcement. This article presents an analysis of philosophical categories and legal principles that mandate the humane treatment of animals.

Methodology and materials: The article was prepared using legal-dogmatic, systemic, comparative and structural methods.

Results and Discussion: Based on scientific knowledge of the concepts of “humanity”, “morality” and “morals”, the author proposes her vision of how these concepts relate to each other and to the concept of “ethics”. The article also provides the analysis of individual categories of morality: “good”, “evil”, “duty”, “conscience”, as well as the possibility of their application not only in relations between people, but also in relation to people’s treatment of animals. The article includes an analysis of modern concepts for legal protection of biological species of animals. The author outlines the process by which moral norms are transformed into legal norms and explains the conditions necessary for such transformation, using the example of the norms and principles of the Federal Law of 27.12.2018 No. 498-FZ “On Responsibility for Animals and on Amendments to the Some Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”.

Conclusions: The main concepts of morality: “good”, “evil”, “duty” and “conscience” are fully applicable to issues of animal treatment. The need for a humane and moral attitude towards animals and providing them with legal protection is fully justified by the ability of animals to experience pain and suffering; this concept is sufficient to develop rational criteria for providing legal protection. At the same time, in order to include moral concepts (“humanity” and “morality”) in legal norms, it is necessary to integrate them into the law, transforming them into legal norms-principles, which should be accompanied by the introduction of other regulatory norms (rules, requirements, restrictions and prohibitions) establishing responsibilities for people and sanctions for their violation.

1. Anisimov, A. P. (2016) Classification of the rights of animals: debatable questions. Business. Education. Right. No. 1 (34). Pp. 183–188. (In Russ.).

2. Aristotle (1983) Works in 4 volumes. Vol. 4. Mysl. 830 p.

3. Bezobrazov, P. V. (1903) On the Rights of Animals / [Comp.] P. V. Bezobrazov. Printing house of A. I. Snegireva. VIII, 220 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bobrov, D. V. (2022) Concepts and problems of classification of animals as objects of property rights. Siberian Legal Bulletin. No. 1 (96). Pp. 43–49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26516/2071-8136.2022.1.43  

5. Voltaire (1988) Philosophical Works. Nauka Publishing House. 750 p.

6. Gorokhov, D. B., Gorokhova, Yu. V. (2016) Animals and plants — subjects of law under the legislation of the Russian Federation: a statement of absurdity or a scientific discovery? Advocate. No. 11. Pp. 5–20. (In Russ.)

7. Gorokhov, D. B., Noshenkova, O. A., Khromova, N. M. (2023) Legal support for the formation of responsible treatment of animals. Black holes in Russian legislation. No. 1. Pp. 60–70. (In Russ.)

8. Gorokhov, D. B. (2019) Problematic result of domestic lawmaking: legislative establishment of the protection of “life and health of animals and plants”. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. No. 2. Pp. 45–78. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2019.2.45.78

9. Gorokhov, D. B. (2022) Legal liability in the field of treatment of animals: Problems of establishment at the federal level. Journal Black holes in Russian legislation. No. 1. Pp. 69–79. (In Russ.)

10. Doinikov, P. I. (2026) Humanitarian problems of legal protection of the animal world in pre-revolutionary Russia: monograph. Moscow: RUSAINS. 106 p. (In Russ.)

11. Bogolyubov, S. A., Gorokhov, D. B., Kichigin, M. V. [et al.] (2020) Commentary on the Federal Law of December 27, 2018 No. 498-FZ “On Responsible Treatment of Animals and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” (article by article); Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. Law firm Contract / LLC «Juridicheskaya firm Contract». 280 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kornilova, N. A., Yakovleva, T. A. (2025) Animals as an object of legal relations. Law and State: theory and practice. No. 4. Pp. 350–353. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47643/1815-1337_2025_4_350

13. Litovko, K. S. (2024) Russian Law-Making (on the Example of the Federal Executive Authority): Ethical Aspect. Theoretical and Applied Law. No. 2. Рр. 90–102. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-90102

14. Lokatoss, I. (2008) Selected Works on the Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Moscow: Academic Project. Triksta. 475 p.

15. Lukyanov, A. S. (2008) Bioethics with the Basics of Biolaw. Scientific World. 360 p. (In Russ.)

16. Nersesyants, V. S. (2020) Philosophy of Law: Textbook for Universities. Norma: INFRA­M. 848 p. (In Russ.)

17. Nordstet, I. (1780) Russian, with German and French translations, dictionary / compiled by court councilor Ivan Nordstet. Part 1: “A–H”. St. Petersburg: At the expense of the printer and bookseller I. K. Shnor. 434 p. (In Russ.)

18. Gadzhiev, G. A. (eds.) (2025) Objects of civil rights: scientific and practical commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Statute. 678 p. (In Russ.)

19. Bogolyubov, S. A., Galinovskaya, E. A., Gorokhov, D. B. [et al.] (2025) Treatment of Animals in Russia and Abroad: Legislation and Law Enforcement: A Scientific and Practical Handbook. Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation: INFRA­M. 456 p. (In Russ.)

20. Pokrovsky, I. A. (1917) Basic Problems of Civil Law. Petrograd: Publ. of the Legal Library “Law”. 328 p. (In Russ.)

21. Razin, A. V. (2006) Ethics: Textbook for universities. Academic Avenue / Akademichesky Prospekt. 624 p. (In Russ.)

22. Descartes, R. (1989) Discourse on the Method of Directing the Mind and of Seeking the Essence of the Sciences. Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/3698

23. Semyakin, M. N. (2013) Philosophical reflection of Civil (Private) law: The continuation of old traditions or new civilistic concept? Russian Law Journal. No. 1 (88). Pp. 56–65. (In Russ.)

24. Singer, P. (2021) Animal Liberation. Sindbad. 448 p.

25. Dictionary of the Russian Academy. Part IV. From “M” to “P” (1793) St. Petersburg: Under the Imperial Academy of Sciences. 1272 p. (In Russ.)

26. Tarantul, V. Z. (2003) The Human Genome: Encyclopedia, written in four letters. Moscow: Slavic Culture Language. 389 p. (In Russ.)

27. Fisher, S. (1899) Man and Animal: An Ethical and Legal Essay. St. Petersburg: Published by Ya. Kantorovich. 281 p.

28. Cicero Marcus Tullius (2000) About the limits of good and evil. Paradoxes of the Stoics. Russian State Humanitarian University. 474 p.

29. Schweitzer, A. (1992) Reverence for Life. Progress. 576 p.

30. Schopenhauer, A. (2001) Small philosophical works. TERRA­Book Club; Republic. 528 p.

31. Anisimov, A. P., Ryzhenkov, A. J. (2016) Animal rights: Their concept and classification. Environmental Policy and Law. Vol. 46, no. 6. Pp. 386–397.

32. Anisimov, A. P., Ryzhenkov, A. J. (2016) The Concept and Classification of Animal Rights: Points for Debating. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 57. No. 3. Pp. 255–274.

33. Saint-Exupery, Antoine de. (2013) The Little Prince. Translated from the French by Richard Howard. EGMONT. 86 p.