Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Reform of the Examination Boards for Admission to the Position of Judge: Goals, Results, Prospects

EDN: YZWGII

Abstract

Introduction: The first stage on the way to a judicial position is passing a qualification exam. For this purpose, examination commissions are formed for the admission of the qualification exam for the position of judge. They became an independent body of the judicial community in 2011, after which the commissions began to include representatives from public associations of lawyers. The deputies believed that this would make the commissions more open to society, improve the quality of justice and reduce corruption. However, the declared goals were not achieved. Proposals have been repeatedly made in the scientific literature to reform the requirements for members of commissions. Such proposals were speculative in nature, as they were not based on empirical evidence.

Methodology and materials: In this article, the scientists’ proposals are compared with data on the composition of the examination commissions of the subjects of the Russian Federation as of 2021. Information on the membership of the commissions was collected on the website of the Higher Examination Commission for the admission of the qualification exam for the position of judge. Additional information about the length of service and place of work was found in open sources.

Research results and their discussion: Some proposals are in isolation from reality and are impossible to implement at the moment. The scientists proposed to establish the numerical composition of the commissions in the number of 13 people, although in reality their average figure is 12 people. There have been proposals to include representatives from all levels of the judicial community in the commissions, although the commissions most often include judges from the regional center (from the regional court of general jurisdiction and from the arbitration court). The closest proposal to implementation is to establish a minimum judicial length of service for inclusion in the commission (10 years), since the average length of service of judges in the commissions is 15 years.

Conclusions: Proposals to reform the examination boards should take into account the existing composition of the commissions.

About the Authors

E. A. Bogolyubov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Egor A. Bogolyubov, PhD in History, senior lecturer of the Department of Theory and History of Law and State 

Saint Petersburg



M. V. Didikova
LLC FPC “Alternative”
Russian Federation

Marina V. Didikova, legal adviser

Kemerovo



References

1. Bagautdinov, F. N., Khairullin, M. M (2011) Requirements for candidates for the position of judge in modern conditions. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, no. 1, pp. 37–40. (In Russ.)

2. Bogolyubov, E. A., Didikova, M.V (2024) Examination commissions as the space for interaction between legal professions in Russia. Zakon, no. 7, pp. 186–195. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-7186-195

3. Burdina, E. V. (2016) Organizational guarantees of independence and competence of examination boards conducting examinations for promotion to the judge office. Russian Judge, no. 1, pp. 50–54. (In Russ.)

4. Burdina, E. V (2016) The legal nature, organization and activities of the judicial community in the Russian judicial system. Dis. ... PhD of Jurisprudence. 537 p. (In Russ.)

5. Volkov, K. A. (2023) Giving a qualification examination for the judge position and improvement issues. Russian Judge, no. 12, pp. 34–39. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2023-12-34-39. (In Russ.)

6. Dmitrieva, A.V. (2019) The patronage of court presidents a success factor in the selection judges by qualification boards. The journal of social policy studies, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 391–406. DOI 10.17323/727-0634-2019-17-3-391-406. (In Russ.)

7. Dudko, I., Kryazhkova, O. (2024) Judges of the Constitutional Court of Russia: who are they? Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 135–160. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2024-3-135160

8. Kiryuschenko, I. I. (2022) Openness and transparent nature of the information on court activities in terms of judiciary staff establishment. Russian Judge, no. 7, pp. 53–56. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2022-7-53-56

9. Kolokolov, N. A. (2017) Judicative authority: proposals of the presidential council of Russia. Magistrate judge, no. 12, pp. 11–17. (In Russ.)

10. Mikhailov, V. K. (2019) Some problems in judicial empowerment which threaten judicial independence. Zakon, no. 4, pp. 83–91. (In Russ.)

11. Romanovskaya, O. V. (2012) The legal status of the examination commissions for the admission of the qualification exam for the position of judge. Grazhdanin i pravo, no. 7, pp. 12–18. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bogolyubov E.A., Didikova M.V. Reform of the Examination Boards for Admission to the Position of Judge: Goals, Results, Prospects. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2026;(1):94-106. (In Russ.) EDN: YZWGII

Views: 176

JATS XML

ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)