The Meaning of World History and The Evolution of States of The Ancient World

Introduction. The article attempts to examine the main patterns and driving forces of state evolution using specific historical material from the evolution of states in the Ancient World. According to the author, identifying such patterns is difficult because the historical process cannot be identified with natural processes and phenomena that can be quantitatively described and formulated on this basis as universal laws. The author believes that it is more appropriate to use the category of the meaning of world history, on the basis of which the specific historical process is revealed in relation to various legal orders and legal traditions of the past, in particular to the states of the Ancient World, which are the subject of the study.

Methodology and materials. The study of the subject is carried out on the basis of post-classical methodology developed by modern theorists and historians of law (S. V. Kodan, D. A. Pashentsev, A. V. Polyakov, I. L. Chestnov, et al). The main research methods used in this work include, first of all, socio-anthropological, phenomenological, cultural-historical, semiotic and other methods that complement the classical (positivistic) methodology traditionally used in literature.

Results of the study and their discussion. The author identifies the main factors in the evolution of the states of the Ancient World, which include: firstly, the universalization of spiritual (moral, religious, legal, political and other) values; secondly, the improvement of the means of sign communication, which facilitates the transfer of cultural information to an increasing number of people and thereby involves them in legal and political communication; thirdly, the growth of the structural complexity of states, which is a response to the challenges created by the external, social and cultural environment; fourthly, the mutual influences of cultural traditions that facilitate the transfer of historical experience. Based on the conducted study, it is concluded that the transition to each subsequent stage of the evolution of the state contributes to an increasingly deeper and more complete disclosure of the meaning of world history, as well as the achievement of unity in diversity by humanity, which is the goal and purpose of historical development.

Conclusions. The meaning of world history, revealed in the course of world-historical development, predetermines its purposeful nature. At the same time, the goal of world history, including the history of the states of the Ancient World, is a characteristic of the development itself, determining its general direction and main stages. It seems that such an understanding of the goal as the most complete disclosure of the axiological content of world history removes the question of the so-called “end of history”, achievable at least in the distant historical perspective.

1. Abramov, A. E., Bagirov, R. S. (2015) Civil-temple community as a form of existence of civil society in the ancient Near East. Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute. No. 3 (36). Pp. 147–151. (In Russ.)

2. Andreev, V. N. (1981) Structure of private wealth in Athens in the 5th–4th centuries BC. Bulletin of ancient history. No. 3 (157). Pp. 21–48. (In Russ.)

3. Andreev, Yu. V. (2001) The price of freedom and harmony. A few strokes to the portrait of Greek civilization. Aletheia. 432 p. (In Russ.)

4. Anners, E. (1994) History of European law. Nauka. 394 p.

5. Dementieva, V. V. (eds) (2010) Ancient polis: Lecture course. Russian Foundation for Assistance to Education and Science. 240 p. (In Russ.)

6. Berve, G. (1997) Tyrants of Greece. Phoenix. 640 p.

7. Braudel, F. (1977) History and Social Sciences. Historical Duration. In: Philosophy and Methodology of History. Progress. Pp. 115–142.

8. Bourdieu, P. (2007) Social Space and Symbolic Power. In: Bourdieu P. Sociology of Social Space. Aleteia. Pp. 64–86.

9. Weber, M. (1990) Preliminary Remarks. In: Weber M. Selected Works. Progress. Pp. 44–61.

10. Velichko, A. M. (2011) “Byzantine” powers of Western emperors and kings. Legal Thought. No. 5 (67). Pp. 57–93. (In Russ.)

11. Hartman, N. (2003) On the foundations of ontology. Nauka. 640 p.

12. Gindin, L. A., Tsymbursky, V. L. (1996) Homer and the history of the Eastern Mediterranean. “Vostochnaya literature” of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 328 p. (In Russ.)

13. Gorshunov, D. N. (2008) Private law in the era of antiquity: the formation of the idea. Bulletin of the Academy of Economic Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 4. Pp. 56–60. (In Russ.)

14. Grushevoy, A. G. (2016) Democracy in the Greek poleis of the Hellenistic period according to honorary decrees in honor of the Euergetes. Mnemon: Research and publications on the history of the ancient world. No. 16-1. Pp. 67–80. (In Russ.)

15. Gurevich, A. Ya. (1968) On the discussion of pre-capitalist social formations: formation and way of life. Questions of Philosophy. No. 2. Pp. 118–129. (In Russ.)

16. Dorofeev, D. Yu. (2015) Personality and communication. Anthropology of the oral and written word in ancient culture. PEI RCHA. 639 p. (In Russ.)

17. Dyakonov, I. M., Yakobson, V. A. (1982) “Nomes”, “territorial kingdoms”, “policies” and “empires”. Problems of typology. Bulletin of ancient history. No. 2. Pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)

18. Evdokimov, P. A. (2016) Kings of pre-Hellenistic Cyprus: between gods and people, between bronze and iron, at the crossroads of East and West. In: Gods among people: the cult of rulers in the Hellenistic, postHellenistic and Roman world. Publishing house of the Russian Academy of Arts. Pp. 78–118. (In Russ.)

19. Zarapin, R. V. (2016) Between freedom and empire: the Greek polis in Hellenistic Egypt. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies. No. 11 (20). Pp. 28–37. (In Russ.)

20. Camus, A. (1990) The Myth of Sisyphus. Essay on the Absurd. In: Camus A. The Rebellious Man. Philosophy. Politics. Art. Politizdat. Pp. 23–100.

21. Cassirer, E. (2002) Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Vol. 3. Phenomenology of Knowledge. University Book. 400 p.

22. Kofanov, L. L. (2015) The External System of Roman Law: Law of Nature, Law of Nations, and Commercial Law in the Legal Thought of Antiquity. Statut. 192 p. (In Russ.)

23. Croce, B. (1998) Theory and History of Historiography. School “Languages of Russian Culture”. 192 p.

24. Lamarck, J. B. (1955) Introductory Lectures to the Course of Zoology. In: Lamarck J. B. Selected Works. In 2 vols. T. I. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Pp. 9–164.

25. Lyotard, J. F. (1998) The State of Postmodernism. Aletheia. 160 p.

26. Lomakina, I. B., Chestnov, I. L. (2024) Posthumanism as a Challenge to the Anthropology of Law. Bulletin of Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Legal Sciences. No. 1 (53). Pp. 27–37. (In Russ.)

27. McLuhan, M. (2005) The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Formation of the Printing Man. Academic Project; Mir Foundation. 496 p.

28. Marr, N. Ya. (1934) Language and Thinking. In: Marr N. Ya. Selected Works. Vol. III. Language and Society. Sotsekgiz. Pp. 90–122. (In Russ.)

29. Mashkin, N. A. (1949) Principate of Augustus. Origin and Social Essence. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 686 p. (In Russ.)

30. Mezheritsky, Ya. Yu. (2016) “The Restored Republic” of Emperor Augustus. Russian Foundation for Assistance to Education and Science. 992 p. (In Russ.)

31. Meyer, E. (1910) Economic Development of the Ancient World. Trud.

32. Naimushina, A.N. (2014) Patterns and Phases of Cultural Diffusion. Bulletin of the Russian State Pedagogical Univ. A. I. Herzen. No. 164. Pp. 78–86. (In Russ.)

33. Pashentsev, D. A. (2022) Anthropocentrism as Overcoming Narrative in Historical and Legal Research. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence. No. 3. Pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)

34. Pozdnyakov, A. A. (2022) What is Lamarckism? Lethaea rossica. Vol. 25. Pp. 48–75. (In Russ.)

35. Poldnikov, D. Yu. (2023) Comparative History of Foreign Law. In 2 v. Vol. I. Legal Traditions of Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Norma, INFRA-M. 544 p. (In Russ.)

36. Polyakov, A. V. (2019) The Constitution of Russia, Traditional Values and the Basic Principle of Law. In: The Constitution and Social Progress: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kant Baltic Federal University Publishing House. Pp. 13–23. (In Russ.)

37. Popper, K. (1992) The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. II. The Time of False Prophets. Hegel, Marx and Other Oracles. Phoenix, International Foundation “Cultural Initiative”. 528 p.

38. Rickert, G. (1998) Natural Sciences and Cultural Sciences. Respublika. 413 p.

39. Tikhonova, S. V. (2025) Communicative Theory of Law in the Digital Age. Diss. … Doctor of Law. Saratov. 433 p. (In Russ.)

40. Toynbee, A. J. (2006) Research of History. In 3 v. Vol. 1. Publishing house of SPbSU, Oleg Abyshko Publishing House. 446 p.

41. Utchenko, S. L. (1978) Political Doctrines of Ancient Rome of the 3rd–1st centuries BC. Nauka. 257 p. (In Russ.)

42. Frank, S. L. (1976) The Meaning of Life. Publishing house “Life with God”. 177 p.

43. Frobenius, L. (1910) Childhood of Humanity. Publishing house of P. V. Lukovnikov bookstore. 369 p.

44. Hobsbawm, E. (2004) The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century (1914–1991). Nezavisimaya Gazeta Publishing House. 632 p.

45. Khokhlov, E. B. (2010) Organization of Economy and Labor in the Ancient Era. Russian Yearbook of Labor Law. No. 5. Pp. 9–25. (In Russ.)

46. Chestnov, I. L. (2020) Postclassical Methodology of Legal Research. Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. No. 2 (76). Pp. 14–21. (In Russ.)

47. Chestnov, I. L., Lomakina, I. B. (2025) Sociocultural Anthropology of Law as a Historical and Legal Methodology. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 2 (106). Pp. 44–49. (In Russ.)

48. Jaspers, K. (1991) The Meaning and Purpose of History. Politizdat. 527 p.

49. Hampl, F. (1939) Poleis ohne Territorium. Klio. Bd. 32. S. 1–60.

50. Rostovtzeff, M. (1926) The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press. 695 p.