The Impact of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the Implementation of Constitutional Guarantees of Human Rights
Abstract
The article is devoted to the implementation of the constitutional right of citizens of the Russian Federation to appeal to interstate bodies for the protection of human rights. The implementation of this right is considered on the example of the European Court of human rights and its rulings. The author gives an assessment of the changes in Russian legislation made on the basis of European Court rulings, as well as the difficulties faced by the state when reforming its legal system.
About the Author
V. V. Filatova
the Institute of Law and National Security of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria V. Filatova PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor Faculty of Law named after M. M. Speransky, Department of International and Integration Law
Sankt Petersburg
References
1. Blankenagel Alexander. “Good-Bye, Council of Europe!” or “Council of Europe, let’s talk!”? Commentary on the judgment of the Constitutional Court of Russia of April 19, 2016 on the enforceability of the judgment of the ECHR in the case of Anchugov and Gladkov of July 4, 2013 [«Proshchay, Sovet Evropy!» ili «Sovet Evropy, davay pogovorim!»? Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii ot 19 aprelya 2016 goda ob ispolnimosti Postanovleniya ESPCH po delu Anchugova i Gladkova ot 4 iyulya 2013 goda] // the Comparative Constitutional Review [Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie]. 2016. No. 6. P. 135–150. (In rus)
2. Budylin S. N. Convention or Constitution? International Law and State Sovereignty Limits // Lex [Zakon Journal]. 2013, No. 12. P. 64–80. (In rus)
3. Vinogradova P. A. The Procedure for Resolving Conflicts of Constitutional and Conventional Interpretation // Russian Justitia. 2015, No. 11. P. 30–33. (In rus)
4. Gilmitdinova M. Kh. From Kalashnikov to Zherebin: Development of the Problems of the Validity of Detention [Ot Kalashnikova do Zherebina: razvitiye problematiki obosnovannosti soderzhaniya pod strazhey] // Russian Chronicle of the European Court [Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda]. 2019. No. 3. P. 151–156. (In rus)
5. Gracheva S. S. Respect for the Rights in the Provision of Psychiatric Care and the Rights of Disabled Persons [Soblyudeniye prav pri okazanii psikhiatricheskoy pomoshchi i prav nedeyesposobnykh lits] // Russian Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights [Rossiyskiy yezhegodnik Yevropeyskoy konventsii po pravam cheloveka] / T. K. Andreeva, E. E. Baglaeva, G. E. Besedin et al. M. : Development of legal systems [Razvitiye pravovykh sistem], 2019. Issue 5: Russia and the European Convention on Human Rights: 20 years together [Vyp. 5: Rossiya i Yevropeyskaya konventsiya po pravam cheloveka: 20 let vmeste]. 576 p. (In rus)
6. The Case “Barsukov v. Russia” 2017 [Delo «Barsukov protiv Rossii» 2017 g.] // Russian chronicle of the European Court [Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda]. 2017, No. 3. (In rus)
7. The Case of “Burdov v. Russia” (No. 2) (application No. 33509/04) [Delo «Burdov protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (№ 2) (zhaloba № 33509/04)] // Russian Chronicle of the European Court [Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda], 2009, No. 4. (In rus)
8. “Solonenko v. Russia”, 2018 [«Solonenko protiv Rossii» 2018 g.] // Russian Chronicle of the European Court of Justice [Rossiyskaya khronika Evropeyskogo Suda]. 2018, No. 2.
9. Kovler A. I. European Convention in the International System of Human Rights: a monograph [Yevropeyskaya konventsiya v mezhdunarodnoy sisteme zashchity prav cheloveka: monografiya]. M. : IZiSP, Norma, INFRA-M [IZiSP, Norma, INFRA-M], 2019. 304 p. (In rus)
10. The Decision of the ECHR of July 4, 2013 The Case of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia (application No. 11157/04, 15162/05) [Postanovleniye YESPCH ot 04.07.2013 «Delo “Anchugov i Gladkov protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii”» (zhaloba № 11157/04, 15162/05)] // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights [Byulleten’ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka]. 2014, No. 2.
11. The Decision of the ECHR of July 15, 2002 Case “Kalashnikov v. Russian Federation” (complaint No. 47095/99) [Postanovleniye YESPCH ot 15.07.2002 Delo «Kalashnikov protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (zhaloba № 47095/99)] // 2002 European Court of Human Rights case-law guide [Putevoditel’ po pretsedentnoy praktike Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka za 2002 god]. M., 2004? 504 p. (In rus)
12. The Decision of the ECHR of March 24, 2016, the Case “Zherebin v. Russian Federation” (complaint No. 51445/09) [Postanovleniye YESPCH ot 24.03.2016 Delo «Zherebin protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (zhaloba № 51445/09)] // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights [Byulleten’ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka]. 2016. No. 12. (In rus)
13. Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: What Next? [Rossiya i Evropeyskiy Sud po pravam cheloveka: chto dal’she?] // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. Russian edition. [Byulleten’ Yevropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiyskoye izdaniye]. 2015. No. 3. P. 136–146. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Filatova V.V. The Impact of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the Implementation of Constitutional Guarantees of Human Rights. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2020;(1):44-49.
Views:
532
Email this article 