CHANGES IN LAW IN CONDITIONS OF PUBLIC MODERNIZATION: HISTORY AND MODERNITY
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-1-45-53
Abstract
The article is devoted to changes in law in the process of social modernization. The historical analysis of changes in legal procedures in the process of historical formation of modern society is carried out. The factors of changes in modern legal systems and in the legal systems of the past are revealed. The article uses the methods necessary for the doctrinal analysis of changes in law, namely: formal-legal, as well as comparative-legal and concrete historical. The result of the study was the analysis and author’s conclusions about legal regulation and legal policy in a postmodern society.
About the Author
V. V. Denisenko
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav V. Denisenko – Doctor of Science (Jurisprudence), Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law
Voronezh
References
1. Altermatt, U. Ethnonationalism in Europe [Ehtnonatsionalizm v Evrope]. M., 2000. (Transl. from German.)
2. Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics. Op. in 4 vol. [Nikomakhova ehtika. Soch. v 4 t.]. T. 4. M., 1983. (In Rus.)
3. Bauman, Z. Individualized society [Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo]. M., 2002. (Transl. from English.)
4. Burke, E. Reflections on the Revolution in France [Razmyshleniya o Revolyutsii vo Frantsii]. Abridged translation from English by E. I. Gelfand. M.: Rudomino, 1993. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://larevolution.ru/Books/Burke1.html (access date 23.02.2022). (Transl. from English.)
5. Bourdieu, P. For rationalistic historicism. Sociologist of postmodernism [Za ratsionalisticheskii istorizm. Sotsiologos postmodernizma]. M., 1996. (Transl. from French.)
6. Vlasenko, N. A. Crisis of law: problems and approaches to solution [Krizis prava: problemy i podkhody k resheniyu]. Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava], 2013. No. 8. P. 43–53.
7. Inozemtsev, V. L. Postmodernity, postmodernity [Postmodern, postsovremennost’]. New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In 4 vol. [Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya. V 4 t.]. T. 3. M., 2010. (In Rus.)
8. Isaeva, N. V. Legal identity (theoretical and legal research) [Pravovaya identichnost’ (teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie)]. M., 2013.
9. Isaeva, N. V. Idea of identity in the discourse of the theory of state and law [Teoriya identichnosti v diskurse teorii prava i gosudarstva]. Jurisprudence [Pravovedenie], 2012. No. 5. P. 117–134.
10. Lyotard, J.-F. Answer to the question: what is postmodern? [Otvet na vopros: chto takoe postmodern?]. Steps. Philosophical journal [Stupeni. Filosofskii zhurnal], 1994. No. 2. P. 87–88. (Transl. from French.)
11. Lyotard, J.-F. Postmodern status [Sostoyanie postmoderna]. SPb., 1998. (Transl. from French.)
12. Mamut, L. S. Social state from the point of view of law. Social legal state: materials of the interuniversity conference [Sotsial’noe gosudarstvo s tochki zreniya prava. Sotsial’noe pravovoe gosudarstvo: materialy mezhvuzovskoi konferentsii]. St. Petersburg, 2003. (In Rus.)
13. Medushevsky, A. N. The crisis of law as a problem of theoretical jurisprudence. Law and society in an era of change [Krizis prava kak problema teoreticheskoi yurisprudentsii. Pravo i obshchestvo v ehpokhu peremen]. M., 2008. P. 89–95. (In Rus.)
14. Moiseev, S. V. Philosophy of law. Lecture course [Filosofiya prava. Kurs lektsii]. Novosibirsk, 2004. (In Rus.)
15. Nemytina, M. V. Interpretations of the category “legal culture” [Interpretatsii kategorii «pravovaya kul’tura»]. Legal cultures. Zhidkov Readings: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference [Pravovye kul’tury. Zhidkovskie chteniya: Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii]. Moscow, March 25, 2001. Ed. G. I. Muromtsev, M. V. Nemyt ina. M., RUDN University, 2012. (In Rus.)
16. Fukuyama, F. The Great Rupture [Velikii razryv]. M., 2004. (Transl. from English.)
17. Fukuyama, F. Trust [Doverie]. M., 2006. (Transl. from English.)
18. Furs, V. N. Philosophy of unfinished modern Jurgen Habermas [Filosofiya nezavershennogo moderna Yurgena Khabermasa]. Minsk, 2000. (In Rus.)
19. Habermas, Y. Philosophical discourse on modernity [Filosofskii diskurs o moderne]. M, 2003. (Transl. from German.)
20. Chestnov, I. L. Actual problems of the theory of state and law. Epistemology of state and law [Aktual’nye problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Ehpistemologiya gosudarstva i prava]. St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Rus.)
21. Chestnov, I. L. Anthropology of legal regulation. Actual problems of the theory and history of state and law: Abstracts of the international scientific-theoretical conference [Antropologiya pravovogo regulirovaniya. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava: Tezisy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-teoreticheskoi konferentsii]. St. Petersburg State University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2003. (In Rus.)
22. Chestnov, I. L. Postclassical theory of law [Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava]. SPb., 2012. (In Rus.)
23. Chukin, S. G. Yu. Habermas versus A. McIntyre: on the question of the foundations of modern philosophizing. Reflection on philosophy at the crossroads of the second and third millennia [Yu. Khabermas versus A. Makintair: k voprosu ob osnovaniyakh sovremennogo filosofstvovaniya. Razmyshlenie o filosofii na perekrestke vtorogo i tret’ego tysyacheletii]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society, 2002. (In Rus.)
24. Shtompka, P. Trust. The basis of society [Doverie. Osnova obshchestva]. M., 2012. (Transl. from Polish.)
25. Bridges, T. The Culture of Citizenship: Inventing Postmodern Civic Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.
26. Douzinas, C. Postmodern Jurisprudence: The Law of Texts in the Texts of Law. New York: Routledge, 1991.
27. Farrel, F. Subjectivity, Realism and Postmodernism: The Recovery of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
28. Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norm. Cambridge, 1996.
29. MacIntyre, A. After Virtue. London, 1981.
30. Raz, J. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
31. Sandel, М. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, 1982.
32. Taylor, М. Community, Anarchy and Liberty. Cambridge, 1982.
Review
For citations:
Denisenko V.V. CHANGES IN LAW IN CONDITIONS OF PUBLIC MODERNIZATION: HISTORY AND MODERNITY. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2022;(1):45-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-1-45-53
Views:
229
Email this article 