The Legal Status of the Indigenous Peoples’ Secretariat of the Arctic Council

Introduction: This article presents a comprehensive study of the legal status and functional role of the Indigenous Peoples’ Secretariat within the institutional architecture of the Arctic Council. The relevance of the research is driven by the insufficient examination of this body in the academic literature. Performing primarily auxiliary functions, the Indigenous Peoples’ Secretariat remains an institutionally constrained element in the system of representation of the interests of the Arctic indigenous population.

Methodology and Materials: The methodological framework includes documentary, comparative legal, and statistical methods, as well as the expert assessment method. The theoretical foundation is institutional analysis of international organizations. The empirical base is formed on the basis of ministerial declarations, regulatory documents of the secretariats, annual reports, and academic publications.

Research Results and Discussion: The primary challenge is the funding deficit, which hinders the full-fledged participation of indigenous peoples in the activities of the Arctic Council’s bodies. Despite the lack of voting rights, Permanent Participants effectively influence the Council’s agenda through informal mechanisms. The integration of the secretariat into the Council’s structure and its relocation to Tromsø did not alter its legal status, while ensuring an expansion of its representational functions at the cost of a slight reduction in autonomy.

Conclusions: A change in the legal status of the secretariat is not a pressing issue for the Arctic Council. States are not prepared to expand its mandate, while Permanent Participants are satisfied with the de facto recognition of their influence. The practical significance of the study lies in systematizing the institutional constraints on indigenous participation in Arctic governance.

1. Voronkov, L. S. (2014) The Arctic Council: a forum for cooperation or an international intergovernmental organization? Yearbook of the Institute of International Studies of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. No. 3–4 (9). Pp. 58–66. EDN: TKZZRD (In Russ.)

2. Zhuravel, V. P. (2022) The Arctic Council: main milestones of development to the 25th anniversary of its establishment. Arctic and North. No. 46. Pp. 220–233. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2022.46.220. EDN: TEYJPI. (In Russ.)

3. Lyapchev, D. Yu. (2016) On the twentieth anniversary of the Arctic Council: international legal aspects of activities. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 4. Pp. 176–184. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2016-4-176-184. EDN: ZUPDVF. (In Russ.)

4. Sboychakova, A. V. (2018) The role of the Arctic Council in shaping environmental security policy in the Arctic. PhD dissertation (Political Sciences). Saint Petersburg State University. Saint Petersburg. 333 p. (In Russ.)

5. Alfredsson, G. (2021) Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic Council: a Unique Feature? The Yearbook of Polar Law. Vol. 13. Pp. 3–15. DOI: 10.1163/22116427_013010002. EDN: PARVNE

6. Barnes, J. (2026) Co-constituting the Arctic Council: The role of the Permanent Participants. Polar Record. Vol. 62. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247426100254

7. Coote, M. L. (2016) Environmental Decision-Making in the Arctic Council: What is the Role of Indigenous Peoples? Arctic Yearbook.

8. Gamble, J. (2015) The Arctic Council Permanent Participants: Capacity & Support — Past, Present & Future. Arctic Yearbook. Pp. 385–388.

9. Gamble, J. (2016) The Arctic Council Permanent Participants: Giant Step Forward in Capacity & Support. Arctic Yearbook. Pp. 326–327.

10. Hansen-Magnusson, H., Gehrke, C. (2024) Re-thinking Global Governance as Fuzzy: Multi-Scalar Boundaries of Responsibility in the Arctic. Global Society. Vol. 39. DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2024.2373077

11. Kavanagh, E. (2026) A Seat at the Table: the Case of Sámi Paradiplomacy and Participatory Rights in Arctic Governance. The Yearbook of Polar Law Online. Vol. 17, № 1. Pp. 41–63. DOI: 10.1163/22116427_017010005

12. Kuokkanen, R. (2026) Overlapping sovereignties: Indigenous polities and Arctic regionalism // A Research Agenda for Arctic Security and Governance / edited by Marc Jacobsen and Elana Wilson Rowe. Elgar Research Agendas. DOI: 10.4337/9781035318612.00007

13. Vullierme, M. (2026) Human security in the Arctic. In: Vullierme, M., Hugues, T., Canova, E., Escudé, C., Baudu, H., Lasserre, F., Varnajot, A., Delaunay, M., Pic, P. The Arctic Review 2025 / edited by Michael Delaunay and Magali Vullierme. URL: https://oniris.hal.science/CEARC/hal-05505630v1

14. Wilson Rowe, E. (2018) Non-state actors and the quest for authority in Arctic governance. In: Arctic governance: Power in cross-border cooperation. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI: 10.7765/9781526131645.00012