Natural-Law Doctrine of Lon L. Fuller in the Context of Postclassical Understanding of Law
EDN: GNGOUJ
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with the specifics of the formation of postclassical natural law thought in the Anglo-American philosophy of law of the mid-twentieth century. The early theoretical heritage of Lon L. Fuller is examined through the optics of postclassical understanding: the critique of the methodological framework of classical legal positivism and the author’s attempt to propose an integrative approach that overcomes the distinction between morality and law are analysed.
Methodology and materials. The research is carried out within the framework of the conceptual scheme “classics-postclassics” used to interpret the styles of legal thinking. The methods of hermeneutic analysis, historical-philosophical reconstruction and comparative approach were used. The analysis is centred on L. L. Fuller’s early texts published in the 1940s–1950s.
Results. It is demonstrated that Fuller’s ideas — criticism of Hume’s “guillotine”, emphasis on the purpose of law, the project of eunomics — stylistically correspond to the postclassical type of rationality. Fuller’s philosophy of law project proposes a restoration of the connection between description and evaluation in law, and connects moral normativity to social reality. Interpreting Fuller within a postclassical paradigm allows to rethink his contribution to debates on the nature of law, legitimacy and justice.
Conclusion. The article demonstrates the heuristic utility of the concept of postclassical legal understanding for analysing Anglo-American philosophy of law. The approach provides a deeper interpretation of key theoretical works of the past and reveals new connections between the history of legal thought and contemporary issues in the philosophy of law.
About the Author
S. V. Vinogradov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Vinogradov, Lecturer of the School of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Research Assistant of Laboratory for Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Projects of Centre for Basic Research Higher School of Economics University, Doctoral Student of the School of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law
Moscow
References
1. Tonkov, E. N., Chestnov, I. L. (eds) (2025) Anthropology of Law: A Post Classical Research Programme. Aletheya. 612 p. (In Russ.)
2. Arkhipov, V. V. Postmortem: The Anatomy of Law by Lon L. Fuller. Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory. No. 2-2009. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’skii dom SanktPeterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011. Pp. 186–203. (In Russ.)
3. Belyaev, M. A. What Problematisation of the Non-classical Theory of Law Do We Need? Review of the Collective Monograph ‘Postclassical Ontology of Law’ (ed. by I. L. Chestnov. Saint Petersburg: Aletheya, 2016. 688 p.). Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 1 (10). Pp. 253–258. (In Russ.)
4. Collingwood, R. G. Autobiography // Collingwood, R. G. (1980) The Idea of History. Autobiography. Moscow: Nauka. P. 321–417. (In Russ.)
5. Lukovskaya, D. I. (2007) The Subject and Methodology of History of Political and Legal Teachings. Pravovedenie. No. 3 (272). Pp. 197–211. (In Russ.).
6. Lukovskaya, D. I. (2020) Postclassical Theories of Natural Law: Are They Theories of Natural Law? Legal Communication of the State and Society: Domestic and Foreign Experience: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. NAUKA-UNIPRESS. Pp. 47– 55. (In Russ.)
7. Lukovskaya, D. I. (2020) Postclassical Theories of Natural Law: Are They Theories of Natural Law? Legal Communication of the State and Society: Domestic and Foreign Experience: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. NAUKA-UNIPRESS. Pp. 47–55. (In Russ.)
8. Lukovskaia, D. I. (2021) Legitimacy of Law as a Dialogue Between the Legislator and His Addressees About Law And Justice. Pravovedenie. Vol. 65. No. 4. Pp. 484–498. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21638/spbu25.2021.407
9. Macintyre, A. (2022) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Kanon-Plus. 368 p. (In Russ.)
10. Maritain, J. (2000) Man and the State. Idea-Press. 196 p.
11. Novgorodtsev, P. I. (1919) On the Social Ideal. Issue 1. Letopis. 343 p. (In Russ.)
12. Petrażycki, L. I. (2010) Theory of Law and the State in Connection with the Theory of Morals. Rossiiskaya politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya (ROSSPEHN). 800 p. (In Russ.)
13. Polyakov, A. V. (2015) Is Revival of the Natural Law in Russia Possible? Pravovedenie. No. 5 (322). Pp. 6–16. (In Russ.)
14. Polyakov, A. V. (2022) Justice as Adherence to the Principles of Law. In: Is Justice Alive in Law? Aletheya. Pp. 40–82. (In Russ.)
15. Polyakov, A. V. (2023) Postclassical Jurisprudence, Evolutionary Theory and Neuroscience (Confession of a Communicativist). In: Postclassical Studies of Law: Prospects of Scientific and Practical Programme. Aletheya. Pp. 29–157. (In Russ.)
16. Aleksandrov, A. S., Aleksandrov, I. A., Andrianov, N. V. [et al.] (2016) Postclassical Ontology of Law: A Monograph. Aletheya. 688 p. (In Russ.)
17. Postclassical Studies of Law: Prospects of Scientific and Practical Programme. Saint Petersburg: Aletheya, 2023. 500 p. (In Russ.)
18. Razuvaev, N. V. (2014) The Modern Theory of Law in Search of Post-Classical Paradigm of Knowledge. Pravovedenie. No. 5 (316). Pp. 136–153. (In Russ.)
19. Razuvaev, N. V. (2021) History of Legal Science in the Context of the Evolution of Legal Thinking. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). No. 5 (81). Pp. 41–51. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.041-051
20. Rorty, R. (2001) The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. In: Richard Rorty’s Neopragmatism. Editorial URSS. Pp. 180–198. (In Russ.)
21. Sizova, N. M. (2014) Classical and Post-Classical Legal Thinking: Ontological Gnoseological, Axiological and Epistemological Relation Criteria. Philosophy of Law. No. 1 (62). Pp. 88–91. (In Russ.)
22. Skinner, Q. (2018) Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. In: Cambridge School: The Theory and Practice of Intellectual History. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. Pp. 53–122. (In Russ.)
23. Stovba, A. V. (2021) NonClassic Legal Thought in the Post-Soviet Space. Antinomies. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 73–89. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17 506/26867206_2021_21_2_73
24. Timoshina, E. V. (2010) Law as Equity: The Concept of Intuitive Law in School of l. Petrazycki. Pravovedenie. No. 6 (293). Pp. 179–195. (In Russ.)
25. Timoshina, E. V. (2014) Classics, Postclassics... Neoclassics: To the Substantiation of Counter-Postmodern Program in the Legal Theory. Pravovedenie. No. 4 (315). Pp. 6–29.
26. Fleck, L. (1999) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual’noi knigi. 220 p.
27. Fuller, L. L. (2007) The Morality of Law. IRISEN. 308 p.
28. Fuller, L. L. (2011) The Anatomy of Law. Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory. No. 2-2009. Pp. 204–319.
29. Fuller, L. L. (2024) Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart. In: Philosophy and the Language of Law. Kanon+ ROII “Reabilitatsija”. Pp. 281–333.
30. Hart, H. L. A. (2024) Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. In: Philosophy and the Language of Law. Kanon+ ROII “Reabilitatsija”. Pp. 168–214.
31. Chetvernin, V. A. (1988) Contemporary Concepts of Natural Law. Nauka. 144 p.
32. Shaveko, N. A. (2021) The Ideal of Law: Kantian Tradition in the Doctrines on Justice of the XXth Century. 2nd ed. Prospekt. 368 p.
33. Ehrlich, E. (2024) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Alef-Press. 458 p.
34. Hume, D. A (1996) Treatise of Human Nature. Works in 2 vol. Vol. 1. Mysl. Pp. 53–655.
35. Bentham, J. (1843) Anarchical Fallacies. Being An Examination of the Declarations of Rights Issued During the French Revolution. In: The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Vol. II. Edinburgh, London: Wiliam Tait. Pp. 489– 534.
36. Frank, J. (1963) Law and the Modern Mind. Anchor Books. 368 p.
37. Fuller, L. L. (1940) The Law in Quest of Itself. The Foundation Press. 147 p.
38. Fuller, L. L. (1946) Reason and Fiat in Case Law. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 59. No. 3. Pp. 376–395. DOI: 10.2307/1335588
39. Fuller, L. L. (1954) American Legal Philosophy at Mid-Century. Journal of Legal Education. Vol. 6. No. 4. Pp. 457–485.
40. Fuller, L. L. (1956) Human Purpose and Natural Law. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 53. No. 22. Pp. 704– 705. DOI: 10.2307/2022413
41. Fuller, L. L. (1981) Means and Ends. In: The Principles of Social Order. Duke University Press. Pp. 47–64.
42. Llewellyn, K. N. (1977) The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. Dobbs Ferry (NY): Oceania Publications. 160 p.
43. Mannheim, K. (1954) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Harcourt, Brace, Routlage & Kegan Paul. 318 p.
44. Mannheim, K. (1986) Conservatism: A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge Kegan & Paul. 256 p.
45. Mousourakis, G. (2008) Legal Empiricism, Normativism, and the Institutional Theory of Law. Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 37. No. 2. Pp. 139–148.
46. Paulson, S. L. (2006) On the Background and Significance of Gustav Radbruch’s Post-War Papers. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 26. No. 1. Pp. 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi043
47. Pound, R. (1910) Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review. Vol. 44. No. 1. Pp. 12–36.
48. Radbruch, G. (1950) Legal Philosophy. In: The Legal Philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin. Harvard University Press. Pp. 43–224.
49. Romano, S. (2018) The Legal Order. Routledge. 179 p. 50. Stammler, R. (1925) The Theory of Justice. The Macmillan Company. 591 p.
Review
For citations:
Vinogradov S.V. Natural-Law Doctrine of Lon L. Fuller in the Context of Postclassical Understanding of Law. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2025;(3):124-137. (In Russ.) EDN: GNGOUJ
Views:
12
Email this article 