Analysis of Evidence in the CAS 2019/A/6636 BC Arsenal v. Russian Basketball Federation Case and Prediction of the Position of CAS in the Case
Abstract
The subject of the article is the question of responsibility of persons for match-fi activities. The issue of probable assessment of evidence in CAS 2019/A/6636 is being considered. Predicting the CAS position is based on established Arbitration practice. The parties positions are modeled based on information available in open sources.
About the Author
D. A. Afanasev
St. Petersburg University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitrii A. Afanasev
St. PetersburgReferences
1. Afanasiev D. A., Vasiliev I. A. Review of the practice of the court of arbitration for Sport in 2009–2014 on attracting clubs to sports (disciplinary) responsibility for manipulating match results [Obzor praktiki Sportivnogo arbitrashnogo suda za 2009–2014 gg po privlicheniu klubov k sportivnoy (disciplinarnoi) otvetstvennosti za manipulirovanie rezultatami matchei] // St. Petersburg lawyer [Peterburgskii urist]. 2018. № 1. P. 72–94. (In rus)
2. Krus A. S. Manipulation or illegal infl on the result of the match [Manipuliacia ili nezakonnoe vliianie na rezultati futbolnogo matha] // in SB.: Legal policy of Russia in the sphere of judicial power: Collection of scientifi articles [Pravovaya politika Rossii v sfere osushestvlenia sudebnoy vlasti]. SPb. : Asterion. 2019. P. 215–220. (In rus)
3. Jun C., Vasilyev I. A., Izmalkova M. P., Dongmei P., Khalatova R. I. Problems of proof in football clubs’ disciplinary liability for match-fi : Practice of the court of arbitration for sport (CAS) (2009–2014) // Journal of Siberian Federal University — Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019. № 3, 05.2019. P. 343–362. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Afanasev D.A. Analysis of Evidence in the CAS 2019/A/6636 BC Arsenal v. Russian Basketball Federation Case and Prediction of the Position of CAS in the Case. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2020;(2):80-85.
Views:
463
Email this article 