Legal doctrine as a means of constructing legal reality
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the law-making meaning of legal doctrine. According to the author, the doctrine is an internally coherent segment of juridical science, with the ability to not only provide the juridical community generally accepted interpretation of legal phenomena, but also to establish mandatory for members Society of behavior patterns. As the legal science in General, the doctrine is a collection of semiotic forms (texts), which construct the juridical reality. As a source of law doctrine creates legal rules on the basis of typification of subjective rights and responsibilities of individuals. Implementation of regulatory functions is carried out by doctrine, according to the author, in three ways, namely, through legislation, jurisprudence and law enforcement practitioners.
About the Author
N. V. Razuvaev
North-West Institute of Management — branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Head of the Chair of Civil and Labor Law,
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Agamben J. Homo sacer. State of emergency [Homo sacer. Chrezvychaynoye polozheniye]. M. : Europe, 2011. (in Rus)
2. Alekseev S. S. General Theory of Law. [Obschaya teoriya prava] In 2 t. T. II. M. : Legal. lit. [Yuridicheskaya literatura], 1982. (in rus)
3. Anikin D. A. Topology of social space: from geography to social philosophy [Topologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva: ot geografii k sotsial’noy filosofii] // Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy [Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. Novaya seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika]. 2014. T. 14. N 1. P. 5–9. (in rus)
4. Antonova L. I. Serving the law — the holy duty of a lawyer [Sluzheniye pravu — svyataya obyazannost’ yurista] // Administrative consulting. 2011. N 4. P. 65–73. (in rus)
5. Aristotle. Politics // Aristotle. Cit. In 4 t. T. 4. M. : Thought [Mysl’], 1983. P. 376–644. Cicero M. T. Dialogues. About the state. About the laws. M. : Science [Nauka], 1966 (in rus)
6. Bayniyazov R. S. Spiritual and Cultural Approach to Legal Awareness and Law [Duhovno-kulturologicheskij podhod k pravosoznaniyu I pravu] // New Legal Thought [Novaya pravovaya mysl’]. 2003. N 1. P. 2–6. (in rus)
7. Batiev L. V. Political and legal doctrines of the XVII century. [Politicheskiye i pravovyye ucheniya XVII veka] SPb. : Ed. R. Aslanova “Legal Center Press” [Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press], 2006. (in rus)
8. Beck U. Risk Society. On the way to another modernity. M. : Progress-Tradition, 2000. (in rus)
9. Bell D. The coming post-industrial society: The experience of social forecasting. M. : Academia, 2004. (trans. from eng.)
10. Belov V. А. Subject-methodological problems of civil science [Predmetno-metodologicheskiye problemy tsivilisticheskoy nauki] // Civil Law: actual problems of theory and practice [Grazhdanskoye pravo: aktual’nyye problemy teorii i praktiki] / total. ed. V. A. Belova. M. : Yurayt-Izdat, 2007. (in rus)
11. Berger P., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A treatise on sociology of knowledge. M. : Medium, 1995. (trans. from eng.)
12. Berman G. J. Western rights tradition : the era of the formation. 2nd ed. M. (trans. from eng.)
13. Bloomfield L. Language [Yazyk]. Ed. 2nd. M. : 2002. (in rus)
14. Bogdanova E. V. On some aspects of the study of the term idiolect in Russian and Western linguistics [O nekotorykh aspektakh izucheniya termina idiolekt v otechestvennoy i zapadnoy lingvistike] // Vestnik LGU im. A. S. Pushkina. 2009. Vol. 1. N 4. P. 100–108. (in rus)
15. Bosho S. Doctrine as a form and source of law [Doktrina kak forma i istochnik prava] // Journal of Russian law. 2003. N 12. P. 70–79. (in rus)
16. Pierre Bourdieu Sociology of social space. M .: Institute of Experimental Sociology. SPb .: Aletheia, 2005. (trans. from fr.)
17. Karl Buhler Theory of language. The representational function of language. M., 2002.
18. Vasilyev A. А. Legal doctrine as a source of law: pros and cons [Pravovaya doktrina kak istochnik prava: za i protiv] // Altai Messenger of State and Municipal Service [Altayskiy vestnik gosudarstvennoy i munitsipal’noy sluzhby]. 2010. N 5. P. 43–47. (in rus)
19. Vasilyev A. А. Legal doctrine as a source of law: historical and theoretical issues. [Pravovaya doktrina kak istochnik prava: istoriko-teoreticheskiye voprosy.] [Author. diss. K. y. n]. Krasnoyarsk, 2007. (in rus)
20. Vakhshtayn V. S. On the conceptualization of the community: once again on residency, or working on mistakes [K kontseptualizatsii soobshchestva: yeshche raz o rezidentnosti, ili rabota nad oshibkami] // Sociology of Power. 2013. Vol. 3. P. 8–26. (in rus)
21. Vakhshtayn V. S. Curiosities and Paradoxes of Phenomenological Intervention [Kur’yezy i paradoksy fenomenologicheskoy interventsii] // Sociology of Power. 2014. N 1. P. 5–9. (in rus)
22. Vinogradov P. G. Essays on the theory of law [Ocherki po teorii prava]. M. : Type. A. A. Levenson, 1915 (in rus)
23. Wittgenstein L. The Logical and Philosophical Treatise // Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Works. P. I. M. : Gnosis, 1994. P. 1–73. (trans. from ger.)
24. Voplenko N. N. Sources and forms of law [Istochniki i formy prava]. Volgograd : Volga State University Publishing House, 2004. (in rus)
25. Second philosophical and legal readings in the memory of V. S. Nersesyants (libertarian legal project) [Vtoryye filosofsko-pravovyye chteniya pamyati V. S. Nersesyantsa (libertarno-yuridicheskiy proyekt)] // Yearbook of libertarian legal theory. 2009. N 2. P. 5–39. (in rus)
26. Garcia Garrido MH Roman private law: incidents, lawsuits, institutions. M. : Statute, 2005. (trans. from spain)
27. Tomas Hobbes Basics of Philosophy // Hobbes T. Works In 2 t. V. 1. M., 1989.
28. Granate N. L. Sources of law [Istochniki prava] // Lawyer [Yurist]. 1998. N 9. P. 6–11 (in rus)
29. Grimm D. D. On the question of the concept and source of the binding legal norms [K voprosu o ponyatii i istochnike obyazatel’nosti yuridicheskikh norm] // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. [Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsii] 1896. N 6. P. 26–53. (in rus)
30. Gulyaikhin V. N. Legal mentality of Russian citizens [Pravovoy mentalitet rossiyskikh grazhdan] // NB. Law and policy issues [NB. Voprosy prava i politiki]. 2012. N 4. P. 108–113. (in rus)
31. Wilhelm Humboldt On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind // Humboldt V. Selected works on linguistics. M., 1984. P. 37–297.
32. Edmund Husserl Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. M., 2009.
33. Edmund Husserl Philosophy as rigorous science. Novocherkassk, 1994. 34. Divisenko K. S. Social studies of the vital world [Sotsial’nyye issledovaniya zhiznennogo mira] // Sociological journal. 2014. N 1. P. 6–21. (in rus)
34. Druker P. Post-Capitalist Society // New Post-Industrial Wave in the West: An Anthology / ed. V. L. Inozemtsev. M., 1999. P. 67–100. (trans. from eng.)
35. Zanin S. V. Birth of the doctrine of natural law during the epoch of Modern Period: Johannes Althusius and Hugo Grotius // History of State and Law. 2013. N 14. P. 24–27. (in rus)
36. Zelenkevich I. S. Legal doctrine and legal science: some aspects of correlation and use as sources of law. [Pravovaya doktrina i pravovaya nauka: nekotoryye aspekty sootnosheniya i ispol’zovaniya v kachestve istochnikov prava] // Northeast Scientific Journal. [Severo-Vostochnyy nauchnyy zhurnal]. 2010. N 2. P. 42–47. (in rus)
37. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Linguistics and humanitarian problems of semiotics [Lingvistika i gumanitarnyye problemy semiotiki]// News of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Ser. literature and language [Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka.]. 1968. V. XXVII. Is. 3. P. 236–245. (in rus)
38. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Odd and even: Brain asymmetry and dynamics of sign systems [Nechet i chet: Asimmetriya mozga i dinamika znakovykh sistem] // Ivanov Vyach. Vs Fav. works on semiotics and cultural history [Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Izbr. trudy po semiotike i istorii kul’tury.]. V. I. M. : “Languages of Russian culture”, 1999. P. 381–603. (in rus)
39. History of the Ancient East. The origin of the most ancient class societies and the first centers of slaveholding civilization. P. I. Mesopotamia [Istoriya Drevnego Vostoka. Zarozhdeniye drevneyshikh klassovykh obshchestv i pervyye ochagi rabovladel’cheskoy tsivilizatsii. CH. I. Mesopotamiya] / ed. I. M. Dyakonov. M. : Science, 1983. (in rus)
40. Kabriyak R. Codification. [Kodifikatsii]. M. : Statute, 2007. (in rus)
41. Kazimirchuk V. P. The social mechanism of the law [Sotsial’nyy mekhanizm deystviya prava]// Sov. state and law [Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo]. 1970. N 10. P. 37–44. (in rus)
42. Kasatkin A. A. The history of language and the history of law (on the material of some Romance languages) [Istoriya yazyka i istoriya prava (na materiale nekotorykh romanskikh yazykov)] // News of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Ser. literature and language. [Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i yazyka]. 1964. V. XXIII. Is. 2. P. 113–124. (in rus)
43. Koseriu E. Synchrony, diachrony and history: the problem of language change [Sinkhroniya, diakhroniya i istoriya: problema yazykovogo izmeneniya]. Ed. 3rd. M., 2009. (in rus)
44. Kotlyar I. A. “Jus commune” as a medieval model of the all-European law and order (XI–XIV centuries) [“Jus commune” kak srednevekovaya model’ obshcheyevropeyskogo pravoporyadka (XI–XIV veka)]. Author’s abstract diss. Ph. D. M., 2011. (in rus)
45. Kotlyar I. A. Sovereign as an institution of European medieval jus commune [Gosudar’ kak institut yevropeyskogo srednevekovogo jus commune] // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11. Right [Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11. Pravo]. 2011. N 4. P. 105–113. (in rus)
46. Kotlya I. A. The concept of “jus commune” in the European legal tradition [Ponyatiye “jus commune” v yevropeyskoy pravovoy traditsii] // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11. Right [Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11. Pravo]. 2009. N 5. P. 89–100. (in rus)
47. Leist O. E. The essence of law. Problems of the theory and philosophy of law [Sushchnost’ prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava]. M. : Zertsalo, 2002 (in rus)
48. Lipshits E. E. Law and court in Byzantium in the 4–7th centuries [Pravo i sud v Vizantii v IV–VII vv]. L., 1976. (in rus)
49. Lyubitenko D. Yu. Legal doctrine in the system of sources of Russian law [Pravovaya doktrina v sisteme istochnikov rossiyskogo prava] // Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii]. 2010. N 4 (10). P. 22–26. (in rus)
50. Malinovsky A. A. Rome Jurisprudence: Methodology and Didactics // Russian law: Education, Practice, Researches. 2017. N 4 (100). P. 16–38. (in rus.)
51. Malko A. V., Khramov D. V. System of non-traditional sources of Russian private law [Sistema netraditsionnykh istochnikov rossiyskogo chastnogo prava] // Leningrad legal journal [Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal]. 2010. N 1. P. 36–39. (in rus)
52. Mamardashvili M. K. Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality. [Klassicheskiy i neklassicheskiy idealy ratsional’nosti]. SPb. : Alphabet, Alphabet-Atticus, 2010. (in rus)
53. Marey A. V. To comprehending the reception of Roman law: the formation of jus commune in Western Europe in the XII–XIV centuries [K osmysleniyu retseptsii rimskogo prava: formirovaniye jus commune v Zapadnoy Yevrope XII–XIV vv.] // State and law [Gosudarstvo i pravo]. 2012. N 5. P. 96–102. (in rus)
54. Marr N. Ya. Language [YAzyk] // Marr N. Ya. Basic questions of linguistics [Osnovnyye voprosy yazykoznaniya]. M., 1935. P. 127–135. (in rus)
55. Marchenko M. N. The course of comparative law [Kurs sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya]. M., 2002. (in rus)
56. Medvedev I. P. Legal culture of the Byzantine Empire [Pravovaya kul’tura Vizantiyskoy imperii]. SPb.: 2001. (in rus)
57. Mikhailov A. V. The Genesis of Continental Legal Dogma [Genezis kontinental’noy yuridicheskoy dogmatiki]. M., 2012. (in rus)
58. Montesquieu Sh. L. On the Spirit of Laws // Montesquieu Sh. L. Fav. manuf. M., 1955. P. 155–655. (trans. from fr.)
59. Mordovtsev A. Yu. Features of legal thinking in modern Russia: the formation of a new discourse [Osobennosti pravoponimaniya v sovremennoy Rossii: formirovaniye novogo diskursa] // Philosophy of Law [Filosofiya prava]. 2011. N 3. P. 13–17. (in rus)
60. Maine G. S. Ancient law: its connection with the history of society and its relation to the latest ideas [Drevneye pravo: yego svyaz’ s istoriyey obshchestva i yego otnosheniye k noveyshim ideyam]. Ed. 2nd. M., 2011. (trans. from eng.)
61. Neshataeva T. N. On the question of sources of law — judicial precedent and doctrine [K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava — sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine] // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. [Vestnik VAS RF] 2003. N 5. P. 91–97. (in rus)
62. Novikova G. R. Religious and legal doctrine of Islam in the context of the legal regulation of the financial relations of modern states [Religiozno-pravovaya doktrina islama v kontekste pravovoy reglamentatsii finansovykh otnosheniy sovremennykh gosudarstv] // Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2016. N 3. P. 165–175. (in rus)
63. Novitsky I. B. Foundations of Roman civil law [Osnovy rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava]. M., 2015. (in rus)
64. Patkul A. B. The concept of a region in the phenomenology of E. Husserl and M. Heidegger [Ponyatiye regiona v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya i M. Khaydeggera] // Logos. Philosophical and literary magazine [Logos. Filosofskoliteraturnyy zhurnal]. 2010. N 5 (78). P. 77–88. (in rus)
65. Peretersky I. S. Digesta Justiniana. Essays on the history of compilation and general characteristics [Digesty Yustiniana. Ocherki po istorii sostavleniya i obshchaya kharakteristika]. M., 1956. (in rus)
66. Pokrovsky I. A. Basic problems of civil law [Osnovnyye problemy grazhdanskogo prava]. M., 1998. (in rus)
67. Poldnikov D. Yu. Stages of development of the jus commune scientific doctrine in Western Europe in the XII– XIV centuries [Etapy razvitiya nauchnoy doktriny jus commune v Zapadnoy Yevrope v XII–XIV vv.] // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 11. Right [Vestnik MGU. Ser. 11. Pravo]. 2013. N 1. P. 87–108 (in rus)
68. Poldnikov D. Yu. Stages of the formation of a civil communist contractual theory of jus commune [Etapy formirovaniya tsivilisticheskoy dogovornoy teorii jus commune] // State and Law. 2012. N 6. P. 106–115. (in rus)
69. Polyakov A. V. Communicative legal thinking: Selected Works [Kommunikativnoye pravoponimaniye: Izbr. trudy]. SPb. : Publishing House Alef-press, 2014. (in rus)
70. Polyakov A. V. Postclasic Jurisprudence and the Idea of Communication [Postklasicheskoye pravovedeniye i ideya kommunikatsii] // News of Higher Educational Institutions. Jurisprudence [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedeniye]. 2006. N 2 (265). P. 26–43. (in rus)
71. Popper K. Knowledge and psychophysical problem: In defense of interaction. M. : Izd. LCI, 2008. (trans. from eng)
72. Chestnov I. L. Postclassical ontology of law: Monograph [Postklassicheskaya ontologiya prava: Monografiya]/ ed. I. L. Chestnov. SPb. : Aletheia, 2016. (in rus)
73. Problems of functional grammar: Categorization of semantics [Problemy funktsional’noy grammatiki: Kategorizatsiya semantiki] / resp. ed. A. V. Bondarko, S. A. Shubik. SPb., 2008.
74. Proskurin S. G. The evolution of law in the light of semiotics [Evolyutsiya prava v svete semiotiki] // Bulletin of the NSU. Ser.: Linguistics and intercultural communication [Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya]. 2008. V. 6. N 1. P. 48–53. (in rus)
75. Puzikov R. V. The Essence of Legal Doctrine as a Source of Law [Sushchnost’ yuridicheskoy doktriny kak istochnika prava] // Legal Policy and Legal Life [Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’]. 2003. N 4. P. 133–138. (in rus)
76. Razuvaev N. V. Right: a social constructivist approach [Pravo: sotsial’no-konstruktivistskiy podkhod] // News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedeniye]. 2015. N 5 (322). P. 48–98. (in rus)
77. Razuvaev N. V. The development of personal identity as a driving force for the evolution of the states of the Ancient World and the Middle Ages [Razvitiye lichnostnogo samosoznaniya kak dvizhushchaya sila evolyutsii gosudarstv Drevnego mira i Srednikh vekov] // One Hundred Years to the Ural State Law Institute (1918–2018): in 2 volumes. V. 1: The Evolution of the Russian and Foreign States and rights: historical and legal research [Sto let Ural’skomu gosudarstvennomu yuridicheskomu institutu (1918–2018 gg.): v 2 v. V. 1: Evolyutsiya rossiyskogo i zarubezhnogo gosudarstva i prava: istoriko-yuridicheskiye issledovaniya] / ed. A. S. Smykalina. Ekaterinburg, 2019. P. 134–150. (in rus)
78. Razuvaev N. V. The modern theory of law in search of the postclassical paradigm of knowledge [Sovremennaya teoriya prava v poiskakh postklassicheskoy paradigmy poznaniya] // News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedeniye]. 2014. N 5 (316). P. 136–153. (in rus)
79. Razumovich N. N. Sources and form of law [Istochniki i forma prava] // Sov. state and law [Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo]. 1988. N 3. P. 20–27. (in rus)
80. Rayanov F. M. The Muslim legal doctrine and its modern dimension [Musul’mansko-pravovaya doktrina i yeye sovremennoye izmereniye] // The Problems of Oriental Studies. 2013. N 2 (60). P. 7–14. (in rus)
81. Rozhnov A. P. Unconventional sources of law in the legal system [Netraditsionnyye istochniki prava v pravovoy sisteme] // Bulletin of Volgograd State University [Vestnik VolGU]. 2001. Ser. 5. Is. 4. P. 27–34. (in rus)
82. Romashov R. А. Legal doctrine in the Anglo-American, Muslim and Russian law: the problem of understanding and forms of expression [Pravovaya doktrina v anglo-amerikanskom, musul’manskom i rossiyskom prave: problema ponimaniya i formy vyrazheniya] // Problems of the methodology and philosophy of law. Collection of articles of participants of the II International Round Table [Problemy metodologii i filosofii prava. Sbornik statey uchastnikov II Mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola] / ed. S. N. Kasatkina. Samara, 2015. P. 30–38. (in rus)
83. Saveliev V. А. Legal technique of the Roman jurisprudence of the classical period [Yuridicheskaya tekhnika rimskoy yurisprudentsii klassicheskogo perioda] // Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossijskogo prava]. 2008. N 12. P. 108–115. (in rus)
84. Stepin V. S. Classics, neklassika, postneklassika: criteria for distinguishing [Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya] // Postneklassika: philosophy, science, culture [Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura] / ed. L. P. Kiyaschenko, V. S. Stepin. SPb., 2009. P. 249–295. (in rus)
85. Stepin V. S. Self-developing systems and post-non-classical rationality [Samorazvivayushchiyesya sistemy i postneklassicheskaya ratsional’nost’] // Questions of Philosophy [Voprosy filosofii]. 2003. N 8. P. 5–18. (in rus)
86. Stovba A. V. Legal situation as the source of being law. [Pravovaya situatsiya kak istok bytiya prava]. Kharkov, 2006. (in rus)
87. Syrykh V. M. Materialistic theory of law: Favorites [Materialisticheskaya teoriya prava: Izbrannoye]. M., 2011. (in rus)
88. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Legal system of a developed socialist society [Pravovaya sistema razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva] // Sov. state and law [Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo]. 1979. N 7. P. 33–38. (in rus)
89. Fedorov A. N. Fragmentation or interaction: on the particularism of the law of medieval Western Europe [Razdroblennost’ ili vzaimodeystviye: o partikulyarizme prava srednevekovoy Zapadnoy Yevropy] // Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University [Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2015. N 23 (378). Ser. Right. Is. 44. P. 18–23. (in rus)
90. Khvostov V. M. The general theory of law. Elementary essay [Obshchaya teoriya prava. Elementarnyy ocherk]. M., 1914. (in rus)
91. Zweigert K., Kötz H. Comparative private law. V. 1–2 [Sravnitel’noye chastnoye pravo]. M., 2011.
92. Chestnov I. L. Postclassical theory of law [Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava]. SPb., 2012. (in rus)
93. Chestnov I. L. Legal communication in the context of post-classical epistemology [Pravovaya kommunikatsiya v kontekste postklassicheskoy epistemologii] // News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedeniye]. 2014. N 5 (316). P. 31–41. (in rus)
94. Chicherin B. N. Political thinkers of the Ancient and New World [Politicheskiye mysliteli Drevnego i Novogo mira]. SPb., 1999. (in rus)
95. Shapp J. System of German civil law [Sistema germanskogo grazhdanskogo prava]. M., 2006. (trans. from ger.)
96. Schütz A. Selected: A World that Glows with Meaning [Izbrannoye: Mir, svetyashchiysya smyslom]. M., 2004. (trans. from ger. and eng.)
97. Yavich L. S. General Theory of Law [Obshchaya teoriya prava]. L., 1976. (in rus)
98. Hocart A. M. Kings and Councillors. Cairo : Egyptian University Press, 1936.
99. Popper K. Evolutionary Epistemology // Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future / Ed. by J. W. Pollard. New York : John Wiley&Sons, 1984. P. 239–255.
100. Purves D. Neuroscience. 5th ed. Sunderland (Mass.) : Sinauer, 2011.
101. Tebbit M. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction. London; New York : Routledge&Kegan Paul, 2005.
Review
For citations:
Razuvaev N.V. Legal doctrine as a means of constructing legal reality. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2019;(1):5-22.
Views:
3321
Email this article 