Legal Proceedings in Digital Rights in Independent Procedural System
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-1-17-22
EDN: DEZGCT
Abstract
Digital rights are an object of civil circulation that has a number of specific features. Such features, in particular, include: the ability to use only through software and hardware, circulation within the framework of an information system and not the material world, self-verification of belonging to a specific subject. Therefore, disputes about digital rights have at least three specific features: these are the disputes about economic assets; the relevant evidence is contained in the very subject of the dispute; these are disputes about a right that does not have property, that is, with the possibility of applying the law following the subject, and not the law at the location of the property.
The purpose of the study is to understand the peculiarities of the circulation of digital rights as objects of civil law regulation and to identify the possibilities for the specific consideration of disputes, the subject of which are digital rights.
Research methods: teleological, comparative and content analysis of law enforcement. Using the teleological method, the intended purpose of regulating the circulation of digital rights was identified. The comparative analysis in the article made it possible to put forward and motivate the opinion on the need to create a specialized court to resolve disputes, the subject of which is digital rights. A limited content analysis of law enforcement practice made it possible to identify the current features of substantive resolution of disputes related to digital rights.
The conclusions of the study are based on the postulate that the legal force of a judicial act resolving a dispute on the merits in relation to a certain digital right will make it possible to determine not only the further legal fate of digital law as an economic asset, but also to authorize the circulation of digital law, to stop (prohibit) the circulation of digital rights or prescribe significant conditions for the circulation of digital rights.
About the Authors
V. A. Mayboroda
North-Western Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor A. Mayboroda, Associate Professor of the Department of Law, judge emeritus, Doctor of Science (Jurisprudence)
Saint Petersburg
E. T. Mayboroda
North-Western Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elvira T. Mayboroda, Associate Professor, PhD in Jurisprudence
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Vasilevskaya, L. Yu. Token as a new civil rights object: issue of legal qualification of digital law [Token kak ob”ekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoj kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava]. Actual Problems of Russian Law [Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava], 2019. No. 5 (102). Pp. 111–119. (In Rus.)
2. Laptev, V. A. Digital assets as objects of the civil rights [Tsifrovye aktivy kak ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav]. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii], 2018. No. 2 (42). Pp. 199–204. DOI: 10.24411/2078-5356-2018-10031. (In Rus.)
3. Mayboroda, V. A. Digital approval of urban planning activities in the Sirius federal territory [Tsifrovoe soglasovanie gradostroitel’noj deyatel’nosti v federal’noj territorii “Sirius”]. Lawyer [Yurist], 2021. No. 12. Pp. 70–75. (In Rus.)
4. Nesterov, A. V. Correlation between the legal categories of Privacy, Secrecy (Secret) and Confidentiality [Sootnoshenie pravovykh kategorij privatnosti, sekretnosti (tajny) i konfidentsial’nosti]. Juridical World [Yuridicheskij mir], 2019. No. 7. Pp. 37–41. (In Rus.)
5. Ovchinnikov, A. I., Fathi V. I. Digital rights as objects of civil rights [Tsifrovye prava kak ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav]. Philosophy of Law [Filosofiya prava], 2019. No. 3 (90). Pp. 104–111. (In Rus.)
6. Safaeva, N. R. Imitation of a corporate dispute as a way to overcome the legal force of a judicial act [Imitatsiya korporativnogo spora kak sposob preodoleniya zakonnoj sily sudebnogo akta]. Herald of Civil Procedure [Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa], 2020. No. 4. Pp. 295–313. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-295-313. (In Rus.)
7. Sukhanov, E. A. On the civil legal nature of “digital property” [O grazhdansko-pravovoj prirode “tsifrovogo imushhestva”]. Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava], 2021. No. 6. Pp. 7–29. (In Rus.)
8. Terentieva, L. V. Common Law Presumption jura novit curia and Branch Presumption jura aliena novit curia in International Civil Process [Obshhepravovaya prezumptsiya jura novit curia i otraslevaya prezumptsiya jura aliena novit curia mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics [Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki], 2018. No. 3. Pp. 195–213. DOI:10.17323/2072-8166.2018.3.195.213. (In Rus.)
9. Yuzefovich, Zh. Yu., Khazova, V. E. Digital rights as objects of civil rights [Tsifrovye prava kak ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav]. Civil Law [Grazhdanskoe parvo], 2022. No. 5. Pp. 15–18. (In Rus.)
10. Yao, B. A Transaction Concluded with the Use of Online Platforms as a Legal Phenomenon in the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China [Sdelka, zaklyuchaemaya s ispol’zovaniem onlajn-platform, kak pravovoe yavlenie v Rossijskoj Federatsii i Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respublike]. Lawyer [Yurist], 2022. No. 4. Pp. 28–33. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Mayboroda V.A., Mayboroda E.T. Legal Proceedings in Digital Rights in Independent Procedural System. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2024;(1):17-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-1-17-22. EDN: DEZGCT
Views:
387
Email this article 