Criteria for a City-Forming Object
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-4-18-23
Abstract
In the article, based on the analysis in the regulation of a historically valuable city-forming object, proposals for further improvement of regulatory regulation are formulated. The authors conclude that city-forming objects are a phenomenon of permanent properties, and therefore it is proposed to differentiate ordinary city-forming objects and historically valuable ones. This approach is based on the fact that urban formation is a process that takes place in modern market conditions and the properties of historical value to such objects begin to be given not by diachronous, but by their synchronous perception in the systemic ratio of the natural and man-made environment.
About the Authors
V. A. Mayboroda
North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Mayboroda, Associate Professor of the Department of Law, retired judge of the Regional Court, Doctor of Law
Saint Petersburg
E. A. Shevchenko
Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences (RAACS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Eleonora A. Shevchenko, Full State Counselor of the Russian Federation of 3rd class, PhD in Architecture, Advisor, Honorary Architect of Russia, corresponding member of International Academy of Architecture
Moscow
References
1. Averina, K. N., Borisov, A. A., Vorobyev, N. I. [et al.] Comments to the Federal Law of June 25, 2002 № 73-FZ “On objects of cultural heritage (monuments of history and culture) of the peoples of the Russian Federation” [Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 25 ijunja 2002 g. № 73-FZ “Ob ob#ektah kul’turnogo nasledija (pamjatnikah istorii i kul’tury) narodov Rossijskoj Federacii”]. Moscow. JPS “Garant”, 2017. 426 p. (In Rus.)
2. Averina, L.V., Myamina, I. S. Problems of Establishing Zones of Protection of Objects of Cultural Heritage and Ways of Their Solution [Problemy ustanovlenija zon ohrany ob#ektov kul’turnogo nasledija i puti ih reshenija]. Property relations in the Russian Federation [Imushchestvennye otnoshenie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii], 2018. No. 4. Pp. 50–63. (In Rus.)
3. Ershova, I. V. Sanatoria: a Unique Phenomenon in the Tourist Market [Sanatorii: unikal’nyj fenomen na turistskom rynke]. Lex russica, 2019. No. 10. Pp. 16–29. (In Rus.)
4. Pirozhkova, I. G. Regional Exceptions in the Regulation of Urban Development in the Russian Empire (on the material of Siberian General-Governorships) [Regional’nye iskljuchenija v regulirovanii gradostroitel’stva v Rossijskoj imperii (na materiale sibirskih general-gubernatorstv)]. Journal of Russian law [Zhurnal rossijskogo prava]. 2022. No. 8. Pp. 22–32. (In Rus.)
5. Shevchenko, E. A. Intangible Cultural Heritage as a Subject of Protection of Historical Settlement: Refl ections on the Subject Of Protection. Academia. Architecture and Construction [Akademija. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo]. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 83–90. (In Rus.)
6. Monod, E. La Section Russie. Exposition universelle de 1889: (Paris, France). Vol. 3. Paris: E. Dentu, 1890. Pp. 150–159.
7. Stewart, John Q. Demographic Gravitation: Evidence and Applications. Sociometry. 1948. Vol. 11. No. 1/2. Pp. 31–58.
Review
For citations:
Mayboroda V.A., Shevchenko E.A. Criteria for a City-Forming Object. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2023;(4):18-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-4-18-23
Views:
328
Email this article 