The Correlation of Administrative and Disciplinary Responsibility of Arbitration Managers
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-2-126-132
Abstract
In the article the problem of correlation of administrative and disciplinary responsibility of insolvency officers. Legal regulation of administrative and disciplinary responsibility of insolvency officers was analyzed and compared. The author argues the possibility of removing from the sphere of administrative responsibility of relations, which are the subject of disciplinary control of self-regulatory organizations of arbitration managers.
About the Author
M. V. Volkov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Volkov, graduate student of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Bagreeva, E. G., Petukhov, S. V. To the Question of Criminal and Subsidiary Responsibility of Controlling Persons [K voprosu ob ugolovnoj i subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti kontroliruyushchih lic]. Russian Investigator [Rossijskij sledovatel’]. 2020. No. 6. P. 58–62. (In Rus.)
2. Barinov, V. Yu. Features of Bringing of Insolvency Officers to Disciplinary Responsibility in the Russian Federation [Osobennosti privlecheniya arbitrazhnyh upravlyayushchih k disciplinarnoj otvetstvennosti v Rossijskoj Federacii] [Electronic resource]. URL: http://admkam.ru/?ELEMENT_ID=19010 (access date: 08.12.2022). (In Rus.)
3. Vinnitsky, A. V. Continuationofthe Discussion Aboutthe Administrative Responsibilityof Court-Appointed Trusteesin Light of the Preparation of the Draft of the New CAO [Prodolzhenie diskussii ob administrativnoj otvetstvennosti arbitrazhnyh upravlyayushchih v svete podgotovki proekta novogo KoAP]. Administrative and Municipal Law [Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo]. 2020. No. 2. P. 1–15. (In Rus.)
4. Getmanov, A. S. Criminal Responsibility of Heads of Enterprises: Legal Analysis and Practical Advice [Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ rukovoditelej predpriyatij: pravovoj analiz i prakticheskie sovety]. Moscow: Editorial Board of Rossiyskaya Gazeta [Redakciya “Rossijskoj gazety”], 2019. Iss. 5. 144 p. (In Rus.)
5. Goryachev, A. S. Legal Status of the Head of a Commercial Organization [Pravovoe polozhenie rukovoditelya kommercheskoj organizacii]. Monograph. Moscow: Jurist [Jurist], 2006. 224 с. (In Rus.)
6. Dobrachev, D. V. Problems of Judicial Practice of Bringing to Vicarious Liability of Controllers of Debtors in Bankruptcy Proceedings [Problemy sudebnoj praktiki privlecheniya k subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti kontroliruyushchih dolzhnika lic v procedure bankrotstva]. Moscow: Infotropic Media [Infotropic Media], 2019. 172 p. (In Rus.)
7. Dorokhina, E. G. Efficiency of Public Administration in Bankruptcy [Effektivnost’ gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere bankrotstva]. Administrative and Municipal Law [Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo]. 2012. No. 8. P. 26–30. (In Rus.)
8. Zhurikov, I. A. Liability of Bank Management in Bankruptcy [Otvetstvennost’ menedzhmenta banka pri bankrotstve]. Banking Law [Bankovskoe pravo]. 2022. No. 1. P. 55–62. (In Rus.)
9. Zabramnaya, E. Yu. Disciplinary Responsibility: Inter-Branch Aspect and Topical Problems of the Legal Institute [Disciplinarnaya otvetstvennost’: mezhotraslevoj aspekt i aktual’nye problemy pravovogo instituta]. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad [Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom]. 2019. No. 3. P. 42–45. (In Rus.).
10. Korshunov, P. N. The Role of Self-Regulated Organizations of Insolvency Officers in the Administration of Justice in Bankruptcy Cases [Rol’ samoreguliruemyh organizacij arbitrazhnyh upravlyayushchih v osushchestvlenii pravosudiya po delam o bankrotstve]. Jurist [Yurist]. 2020. No. 3. P. 16–23. Access from the ConsultantPlus. (In Rus.)
11. Laptev, V. A. Corporate Law: Legal Organization of Corporate Systems: Monograph [Korporativnoe pravo: pravovaya organizaciya korporativnyh sistem: monografiya]. Moscow: Prospect, 2019. 384 p. (In Rus.)
12. Matveenko, P. V. Liability of Officials of the Organization [Otvetstvennost’ dolzhnostnyh lic organizacii] [Electronic edition] / ed. by Yu. L. Fadeev. Access from the ConsultantPlus [SPS Konsul’tantPlyus]. 2006. (In Rus.)
13. Morozova, N. A. Non-Alternative Administrative Sanctions [Bezal’ternativnye administrativnye sankcii]. Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossijskogo prava]. 2019. No. 3. P. 129–138. (In Rus.)
14. Norming the workload in the federal courts of general jurisdiction and federal arbitration courts: expert report of the Higher School of Economics [Normirovanie nagruzki v federal’nyh sudah obshchej yurisdikcii i federal’nyh arbitrazhnyh sudah: ekspertnyj doklad NIU VSHE] / M. I. Davydov, P. S. Gladyshev, K. I. Golovschinsky, E. A. Shishkin; National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House [Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki]. 2019. 296 p. (In Rus.)
15. Liability for Tax Crimes: Official Explanations and Professional Commentary (article-by-article) [Otvetstvennost’ za nalogovye prestupleniya: oficial’nye raz”yasneniya i professional’nyj kommentarij (postatejnyj)] / V. M. Zaripov, M. G. Koshkin, L. V. Kravchinsky et al; ed. by S. G. Pepelyaev. Moscow: Justitsinform [Yusticinform], 2021. 148 p. (In Rus.)
16. Rykov, I. Y. Subsidiary Responsibility: Trends of Modern Management [Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost’: tendencii sovremennogo menedzhmenta]. 2nd ed. [Electronic edition]. Moscow: Statut [Statut], 2019. 195 p. (In Rus.)
17. Stepanov, D. I., Mikhalchuk, Yu. S. Liability of the director to the corporation for losses caused to it in judicial practice [Otvetstvennost’ direktora pered korporaciej za prichinennye ej ubytki v sudebnoj praktike]. Moscow: Statut [Statut], 2018. 207 p. (In Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Volkov M.V. The Correlation of Administrative and Disciplinary Responsibility of Arbitration Managers. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2023;(2):126-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-2-126-132
Views:
263
Email this article 