Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Subjective Rights in the Light of the Reform on Public Servitudes

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the results of the land law reform which was carried out in 2018, namely the introduction of updated provisions on public servitudes to the Land Code of the Russian Federation. It can be argued that today in the Land Code of the Russian Federation there are rules on two types of public servitudes — for benefit of any number of unspecified persons (art. 23) and in favour of certain entities (Ch. V.7). Both types of public servitudes are established in accordance with the Land Code of the Russian Federation, i. e. the provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are inapplicable to the legal relations arising in connection with establishment, implementation and termination of public servitudes. In this context the question on the legal nature of public servitudes arises. In particular are public servitudes subjective property rights? The author of the article offers answers to this and some other questions.

About the Author

T. S. Krasnova
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Docent (Associate Professor) at the Legal Protection of Environment Department of the Law Faculty, PhD in Law

 Saint Petersburg



References

1. Boltanova E. S. Public Easement for Construction Activities: Addressing Citizens’ Constitutional Rights and Balancing Interests [Publichnyy servitut v tselyakh stroitel’stva sooruzheniy: voprosy konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan i obespecheniya balansa interesov] // Law [Zakon]. 2019. № 2. P. 45–55. (In rus)

2. Vinnitsky A. V. Public property [Publichnaya sobstvennost’]. M., 2013. 732 p. (In rus)

3. Krasnova T. S. Autonomy of Will and Its Restriction in Easement Law [Avtonomiya voli i yeye ogranicheniye v servitutnom prave]. M., 2019. 255 p. (In rus)

4. Krasnova T. S. Public Easement for Placing a Linear Object: Commentary on the Novels of the Land Code of the Russian Federation [Publichnyy servitut dlya razmeshcheniya lineynogo ob”yekta: kommentariy k novellam Zemel’nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii] // The Herald of Commercial Justice of Russia [Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF]. 2019. № 3. P. 124–144. (In rus)

5. Melnikov N. N. A Critical Analysis of the Federal Law on the Simplification of the Placement of Linear Objects and the Implied Easement as a Mechanism for Eliminating Identified Shortcomings [Kriticheskiy analiz Federal’nogo zakona ob uproshchenii razmeshcheniya lineynykh ob”yektov i podrazumevayemyy servitut kak mekhanizm ustraneniya vyyavlennykh nedostatkov] // Economy and Law [Khozyaystvo i Pravo]. 2018. № 10. P. 64–73. (In rus)

6. A New Life of Public Easements. Event. Comments of experts [Novaya zhizn’ publichnykh servitutov. Sobytiye. Kommentarii ekspertov] (A. A. Ivanova, A. O. Rybalov, R. S. Bevzenko, etc.) // Law [Zakon]. 2018. № 10. P. 17– 37. (In rus)

7. Rybalov A. O. Legal Easement in Russian Law [Legal’nyy servitut v rossiyskom prave] // Bulletin of Civil Law [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2010. № 5. P. 4–12. (In rus)

8. Rybalov A. O. Certain Issues of Establishing Public Easements (as Illustrated by Courts Practice) [Nekotoryye voprosy ustanovleniya publichnykh servitutov (na primerakh iz sudebnoy praktiki)] // Law [Zakon]. 2016. № 6. P. 42–52. (In rus)

9. Bogusz B. Land: Balancing Competing Economic and Social Interests // Modern Studies in Property Law / Ed. by W. Barr. Oxford — Portland, Oregon. 2015. Vol. 8. P. 75–95.

10. Parchomovsky G., Bell A. Land Burdens in the Service of Conservation // Towards a Unified System of Land Burdens? Intersentia Antwerpen — Oxford. 2006. P. 137–162.

11. Resta G. Systems of Public Ownership // Comparative Property Law. Global Perspective; ed. by M. Graziadei, L. Smith. Cheltenham, UK. 2017. P. 216–257.

12. Van Erp S., Akkermans B. Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Property Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon. 2012. 1170 p.


Review

For citations:


Krasnova T.S. Subjective Rights in the Light of the Reform on Public Servitudes. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2019;(2):31-37.

Views: 669


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)