Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Digital Transformation of Subjective Civil Rights: Problems and Prospects

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-1-18-38

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of digital transformation of subjective civil rights, which is the most important characteristic of civil circulation in the information society. According to the author, digital transformation is a systemic change in the main features and content of subjective law under the influence of digital technologies, with the help of which new types of property are constructed, namely cryptocurrencies, digital rights, tokens, databases, and other virtual objects. The characteristic properties of such objects, first of all, the absence of a material substrate, that is, physical, material expression, make it difficult to characterize them as things, in the traditional meaning of this concept.

However, the needs for the development of civil turnover in the context of the digitalization of the economy makes it necessary and inevitable for the participation of various types of digital property as objects of both property and contractual rights. The civil circulation of digital objects becomes possible as a result of endowing the latter with the properties of things or actions, which implies the formation of appropriate legal regimes. Since the legal regime, as shown in the work, includes three main elements, namely, objects of rights, subjective civil rights and regulatory means, digital transformation affects all these elements, contributing to their modification.

At the same time, the main attention in the work is paid precisely to subjective civil rights, which, in a situation of underdeveloped regulatory regulation, are the main regulator of digital property turnover. Considering the prospects for the digital transformation of subjective civil rights in the context of the digitalization of civil law and order, the author comes to the conclusion that the processes considered in the work will affect not only the sphere of property rights, but also the personal non-property rights of subjects. The analysis performed allows us to formulate some proposals for improving the current civil legislation, contributing to its further reform.

About the Author

N. V. Razuvaev
North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Doctor of Law, Head of the Department of Civil and Labor Law

St. Petersburg



References

1. Abramova, E. N. Discussions about the Legal Nature of Cryptocurrency [Diskussii o pravovoi prirode kriptovalyuty] // Law and modern economics. Sat. materials of the I International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Faculty of Law of St. Petersburg State University of Economics [Pravo i sovremennaya ehkonomika. Sb. materialov I Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii yuridicheskogo fakul’teta SPBGEHU], April 5, 2018 / under scientific. ed. N. A. Krainova. SPb. : Publishing house of SPbSUE [Izd-vo SPBGEU], 2018. Pp. 51–60. (in rus)

2. Akhmetyanova, Z. A. Property Rights in Civil Law of Russia [Veshchnye prava v grazhdanskom prave Rossii] // Civilist [Tsivilist]. 2006. No. 1. Pp. 28–37. (in rus)

3. Akhmetyanova, Z. A. Legal Nature of Rental Relations [Pravovaya priroda arendnykh otnoshenii] // Lawyer [Yurist]. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 16–22. (in rus)

4. Alekseev, S. S. General Theory of Law [Obshchaya teoriya prava]. In 2 Volumes. Vol. 2. M. : Jurid. lit. [Yurid. lit.], 1982. 360 p. (in rus)

5. Andreev, V. K. Dynamics of Regulating of Artificial Intelligence [Dinamika pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta] // Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava]. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 58–68. (in rus)

6. Appadurai, A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1996. XI + 229 p.

7. Arkhipov, V. V. Virtual Property: Complex Legal Issues within the Context of Development of Online Games Industry [Virtual’naya sobstvennost’: sistemnye pravovye problemy v kontekste razvitiya industrii komp’yuternykh igr] // Law [Zakon]. 2014. No. 9. Pp. 69–90. (in rus)

8. Arslanov, К. М. History, Modern Status and Development Prospects of Cryptocurrency: Russian and Foreign Legal Experience [Istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya kriptovalyuty: rossiiskii i inostrannyi pravovoi opyt] // Civil Law [Grazhdanskoe pravo]. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 24–27. (in rus)

9. Bakhtin, M. M. Problem of the Text [Problema teksta] / M. M. Bakhtin. Collected works. T. 5. Works of the 1940s–1960s. [Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenii. T. 5. Raboty 1940–1960-kh godov] M. : Russian Dictionaries [Russkie slovari], 1997. Pp. 306–326. (in rus)

10. Barkov, A. V. Civil-lawful Means in the Mechanism of the Lawful Regulation: Questions of the Methodology [Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya] // Law and State: Theory and Practice [Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika]. 2008. No. 5 (41). Pp. 56–59. (in rus)

11. Baudrillard, J. Symbolic Exchange and Death [Simvolicheskii obmen i smert’]. M. : Dobrosvet, 2000. 387 p. (transl. from French)

12. Benke, N., Meissel, F. S. Übungsbuch römisches Sachenrecht. Wien : Manz’sche Verlag, 2008. 286 p.

13. Braginsky, M. I. On the Issue of the Relationship between Property and Obligations [K voprosu o sootnoshenii veshchnykh i obyazatel’stvennykh pravootnoshenii] // Civil Code of Russia: Problems. Theory. Practice [Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossii: Problemy. Teoriya. Praktika] / otv. ed. A. L. Makovsky. M. : Publishing House of International Center of Financial and Economic. Development [Izd-vo Mezhdunar. tsentra finansovo-ehkonomich. razvitiya], 1998. Pp. 113–130. (in rus)

14. Braginsky, M. I., Vitryansky, V. V. Contract Law. In 6 books. Book 1. General Provisions [Dogovornoe pravo. V 6 kn. Kn. 1: Obshchie polozheniya]. M. : Statut, 2011. 850 p. (in rus)

15. Chestnov, I. L. Legal Communication in the Context of Postclassical Epistemology [Pravovaya kommunikatsiya v kontekste postklassicheskoi ehpistemologii] // News of Higher Educational Institutions. Jurisprudence [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie.]. 2014. No. 5 (136). Pp. 31–41. (in rus)

16. Chikulaev, R. V. Issues of Electronic Financial Instruments [Voprosy ehlektronnykh finansovykh instrumentov] // Perm Legal Almanac [Permskii yuridicheskii al’manakh]. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 528–543. (in rus)

17. Civil Law. In 4 volumes. Vol. 1: General Part [Grazhdanskoe pravo. V 4 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast’] / otv. ed. E. A. Sukhanov. M. : Walters Kluvers [Volters Kluvers], 2006. 958 p. (in rus)

18. Cohen, S. I. The Russian Economy: New Normal, Past Imbalances, Future Globalization // Journal Institutional Studies. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 24–40.

19. Corazza, G. E. Organic Creativity for Well-Being in the Post-Informational Society // Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2017. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 599–605.

20. Digital Rights — a New Object of Civil Rights [Tsifrovye prava kak novyi ob”ekt grazhdanskogo prava] // Zakon. 2019. No. 5. Pp. 31–54. (in rus)

21. Dmitrik, N. A. Digital Transformation: Legal Dimension [Tsifrovaya transformatsiya: pravovoe izmerenie] // Jurisprudence [Pravovedenie]. 2019. Vol. 63. No. 1. Pp. 28–36. (in rus)

22. Efimova, L. G. Cryptocurrencies as an Object of Civil Law [Kriptovalyuty kak ob”ekt grazhdanskogo prava] // Business and Law [Khozyaistvo i pravo]. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 17–25.

23. Efimova, L. G. About the Relationship between Property and Liability Rights [O sootnoshenii veshchnykh i obyazatel’stvennykh prav] // State and Law [Gosudarstvo i pravo]. 1998. No. 10. Pp. 37–44. (in rus)

24. Egorova, M. A., Efimova, M. G. The Concept of Cryptocurrency in the Context of Improvement of the Russian Legislation [Ponyatie kriptovalyut v kontekste sovershenstvovaniya rossiiskogo zakonodatel’stva] // Lex russica. 2019. No. 7. Pp. 130–140. (in rus)

25. El-Erlan, M. A. Navigating the New Normal in Industrial Countries. Washington : Per Jacobsson Foundation, 2010. 40 p.

26. Em, V. S., Sukhanov, E. A. About the Types of Subjective Civil Rights and the Limits of Their Implementation [O vidakh sub”ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav i o predelakh ikh osushchestvleniya] // Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2019.Vol. 19. No. 4. Pp. 7–21. (in rus)

27. Frolov, I. V. Cryptocurrency as a Digital Financial Asset in Russian Jurisdiction: on the Issue of Corporeal or Legally Binding Concept [Kriptovalyuta kak tsifrovoi i finansovyi aktiv v rossiiskoi yurisdiktsii: k voprosu o veshchnoi ili obyazatel’stvennoi prirode] // Law and Economics [Pravo i ehkonomika]. 2019. No. 6. Pp. 5–17. (in rus)

28. Fuchs, E. Das Wesen der Dinglichkeit. Ein Beitrag zur allgemeiner Rechtslehre und zur Кritik des Entwurfs eines Вürgerlichen Gesetzbuches für das Deutsche Reich. Berlin : Heymanns, 1889. 157 p.

29. Golovkin, R. B., Amosova O. S. “Digital Rights” and “Digital Law” in the Mechanisms of Digitalization of the Economy and Public Administration [«Tsifrovye prava» i «tsifrovoe pravo» v mekhanizmakh tsifrovizatsii ehkonomiki i gosudarstvennogo upravleniya] // Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute [Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta]. 2019. No. 2 (51). Pp. 163–166. (in rus)

30. Gruzdev, V. V. The Concept of Civil Law Protection and Its Place in the Mechanism of Civil Law Regulation [Ponyatie grazhdansko-pravovoi zashchity i ee mesto v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya] // Law and State: Theory and Practice [Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika]. 2009. No. 5 (53). Pp. 37–40. (in rus)

31. Hartley, R. V. L. Transmission of Information // Bell System Technical Journal. 1928. Vol. 7. No. 3. Pp. 535–563.

32. Hasija, D., Liou, R.-S., Ellstrand, A. Navigating the New Normal: Political Affinity and Multinationals’ Post-Acquisition Performance [Electronic resource] // Journal of Management Studies. 2019. 57 (3). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337792251_Navigating_the_New_Normal_Political_Affinity_and_Multi-nationals_Post-Acquisition_Performance (Access date: 25.02.2021).

33. Kartskhia, A. A. Digital Transformation of Law [Tsifrovaya transformatsiya prav] // Monitoring of Law Enforcement [Monitoring pravoprimeneniya]. 2019. No. 1 (30). Pp. 25–29. DOI: 10.21681/2226-0692-2019-1-25-29 (in rus)

34. Kaser, M. Das Urteil als Rechtsquelle im Römischen Recht // Festschrift für Fritz Schwing / hrsg. von R. Strasser. Wien : Metzger, 1978. Pp. 116–130.

35. Khalabudenko, O. Legal Norms in the Focus of the Constructivism Theory // Theoretical and Applied Law. 2020. No. 2 (4). Pp. 31–43. (in Russian and in English)

36. Khannashi, S. To the Question about the Essence of Civil-Law Regime [K voprosu o sushchnosti grazhdanskopravovogo rezhima] // State Councilor [Gosudarstvennyi sovetnik]. 2014. No. 4 (8). Pp. 5–7. (in rus)

37. Khatuntsev, O. A. The Problem of Dividing Rights into Real and Obligatory [Problema deleniya prav na veshchnye i obyazatel’stvennye] // Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice [Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika]. 2008. No. 9. Pp. 93–97. (in rus)

38. Kornienko, N. Yu., Korolev, G. A. Development of Approaches to the Legislative Regulation of Cryptocurrency Turnover as a New Type of Financial Instruments in the EAEU Countries [Razvitie podkhodov k zakonodatel’nomu regulirovaniyu oborota kriptovalyuty kak novogo vida finansovykh instrumentov v stranakh EAEHS] // Taxes and Finance [Nalogi i finansy]. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 18–25. (in rus)

39. Kukhta, M. S. Design in Information Society: Disappearing Function of a Thing [Dizain v informatsionnom obshchestve: ischezayushchaya funktsiya veshchi] // Proceedings of the Academy of Technical Aesthetics and Design. 2014 [Trudy akademii tekhnicheskoi ehstetiki i dizaina]. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 36–38. (in rus)

40. Laptev, V. A. Digital Assets as Objects of Civil Rights [Tsifrovye aktivy kak ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav] // Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii]. 2018. No. 2 (42). Pp. 199–204. (in rus)

41. Legal Tech Development Online Conference (St. Petersburg, April 20, 2020). // Theoretical and Applied Law. 2020. No. 2 (4). Pp. 100–105. (in Russian and in English)

42. Lisachenko, A. V. Law of Virtual Worlds: New Objects of Civil Rights [Pravo virtual’nykh mirov: novye ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav] // Russian Juridical Journal [Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal]. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 104–110. (in rus)

43. Lorenz, D. V. Digital Rights in Real Estate: Legal Nature and Methods of Protection [Tsifrovye prava v sfere nedvizhimosti: yuridicheskaya priroda i sposoby zashchity] // Russian Justitia [Rossiiskaya yustitsiya]. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 57–60. (in rus)

44. Mager, H. Besonderheiten des dinglichen Anspruchs // Archiv für die civilistische Praxis. 1993. Bd. 193. Heft 1. S. 68–85.

45. Mandelbrot, B., Hudson, R. L. The Misbehavior of Markets: a Fractal Revolution in Finance [(Ne)poslushnye rynki: fraktal’naya revolyutsiya v finansakh]. M. : Publishing House “Williams” [ID «Vil’yams»], 2006. 400 p. (transl. from English). (in rus)

46. McLuhan M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: the Making of a Tipographic Man [Galaktika Gutenberga: stanovlenie cheloveka pechatayushchego]. M. : Academic Project; Foundation “Mir” [Akademicheskii Proekt; Fond «Mir»], 2005. 496 p. (transl. from English) (in rus)

47. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System [Electronic resource]. URL: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (Access date: 20.02.2021).

48. Novoselova, L. A. On the Legal Nature of Bitcoin [O pravovoi prirode bitkoina] // Business and Law [Khozyaistvo i pravo]. 2017. No. 9. Pp. 3–15. (in rus)

49. Novoselova, L. A., Polezhaev, A. V. Digital Signs as Objects of Civil Rights [Tsifrovye znaki kak ob”ekty grazhdanskikh prav] // Entrepreneurial Law [Predprinimatel’skoe pravo]. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 3–12. (in rus)

50. Pargellis, A. N. The Spontaneous Generation of Digital ”Life” // Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1996. Vol. 91. No. 1–2. Pp. 86–96.

51. Raikher, V. K. Absolute and Relative Rights (to the Problem of Dividing Economic Rights) [Absolyutnye i otnositel’nye prava (k probleme deleniya khozyaistvennykh prav)] // Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2007. No. 2. Pp. 144–204. (in rus)

52. Rodionova, O. M. The Mechanism of Civil Regulation: Composition, Structure, Action [Mekhanizm grazhdanskopravovogo regulirovaniya: sostav, struktura, deistvie] // Legislation [Zakonodatel’stvo]. 2012. No. 8. Pp. 21–31. (in rus)

53. Sannikova, L. V., Kharitonova, Yu. S. Legal Essence of New Digital Assets [Pravovaya sushchnost’ novykh tsifrovykh aktivov] // Zakon. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 86–95. (in rus)

54. Savelyev, A. I. Data Commercialization Regulation in the Era of Shaping Digital Economy (Civil Law Aspects) [Grazhdansko-pravovye aspekty regulirovaniya oborota dannykh v usloviyakh popytok formirovaniya tsifrovoi ehkonomiki] // Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 60–92. (in rus)

55. Savigny, F. K. The System of Modern Roman Law. In 8 volumes. Vol. III [Sistema sovremennogo rimskogo prava. V 8 t. T. III]. M. : Statut, 2013. 717 p. (transl. from German) (in rus)

56. Shannon, C. Mathematical Theory of Communication [Matematicheskaya teoriya svyazi] / C. Shannon. Works on Information Theory and Cybernetics [Raboty po teorii informatsii i kibernetike]. M. : Publishing House of Foreign Literature [Izd-vo inostr. literatury], 1963. Pp. 243–332. (transl. from English)

57. Sinitsyn, S. A. Numeris clausis and Subjective Rights: Concept, Meaning, Relationship [Numeris clausis i sub”ektivnye prava: ponyatie, znachenie, vzaimosvyaz’] // Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 100–147. (in rus)

58. Smith, R. C. Deducting Intangible Asset Value for Property Tax Purposes: How “Necessary Intangibles” Are Treated in Two Recent Cases // Insight. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 62–70.

59. Snijders, W. De openheid van het vermogensrecht. Van syndicaatszekerheden, domeinnamen en nieuwe contractsvormen // Onderneming en 10 jaar nieuw Burgerlijk Recht. Leiden : Kluwer, 2002. Pp. 27–58.

60. Sklovsky, K. I. Property in Civil Law [Sobstvennost’ v grazhdanskom prave]. Ed. 5th, rev. M. : Statut, 2010. 893 p. (in rus)

61. Sukhanov, E. A. Property Law in Modern Russia: Several Fundamental Theses [Pravo sobstvennosti v sovremennoi Rossii: neskol’ko printsipial’nykh tezisov] // Russia and the Modern World [Rossiya i sovremennyi mir]. 2001. No. 3 (32). Pp. 102–108. (in rus)

62. Struycken, T. H. D. De numerus clausus in het goederenrecht: een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de rechtsgeleerdheid. Deventer : Kluwer, 2007. 902 p.

63. Swan, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. Oxford : O’Reilly Media, 2015. 152 p.

64. Talapina, E. V. Digital Transformation in France: legal Innovations [Tsifrovaya transformatsiya vo Frantsii: pravovye novelly] // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics [Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki]. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 164–184. (in rus)

65. Titiyevskiy, A. N. Concept and Structure of Civil Legal Regime of Things from the Point Systems Approach [Ponyatie i sushchnost’ pravovogo rezhima veshchei s pozitsii sistemnogo podkhoda] // Bulletin of the Tyumen State University [Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2012. No. 3. Pp. 128–133. (in rus)

66. Tolkachev, A., Zhuzhzhalov, M. Cryptocurrency as a Property — Analysis of Current Legal Status [Kriptovalyuta kak imushchestvo — analiz tekushchego pravovogo statusa] // Herald of Economic Justice [Vestnik ehkonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. 2018. No. 9 (55). Pp. 91–135. (in rus)

67. Trent, G. Digital Rights to Access Corporate Data [Tsifrovye prava na dostup k korporativnym dannym] // Networks and Communication Systems [Seti i sistemy svyazi]. 2006. No. 13. Pp. 61–65. (in rus)

68. Usmanov, I. P. Non-Documentary Security — Is It Fiction? [Bezdokumentarnaya tsennaya bumaga — fiktsiya li ehto?] // Society and Law [Bezdokumentarnaya tsennaya bumaga — fiktsiya li ehto?]. 2009. No. 2 (24). Pp. 73–76. (in rus)

69. Van der Steur J. C. Grenzen van rechtsobjecten. Een onderzoek naar de grenzen van objecten van eigendomsrechten en intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Leiden : Kluwer, 2003. 384 p.

70. Vasilevskaya, L. Yu. Token as a New Civil Rights Object: Issues of Legal Classification of Digital Law [Token kak novyi ob”ekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoi kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava] // Actual Problems of Russian Law [Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava]. 2019. No. 5 (102). Pp. 111–119. (in rus)

71. Viner, N. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine [Kibernetika, ili upravlenie i svyaz’ v zhivotnom i mashine]. Ed. 2nd. M. : Soviet radio [Sovetskoe radio], 1968. 325 p. (in rus)

72. Weber, R. H. Dritte Spuren zwischen absoluten und relativen Rechten? // Aktuelle Aspekte des Schuld- und Sachenrechts. Festschrift für Heinz Rey zum 60. Gebutstag. Zürich : Schultess, 2003. S. 583–596.

73. Wittgenstein, L. Logical-Philosophical Treatise [Logiko-filosofskii traktat] / L. Wittgenshgein. Philosophical Works [Filosofskie raboty]. M. : Gnosis, 1994. T. 1. Pp. 1–73. (transl. from German)

74. Wilke, C. O., Adami, C. The Biology of Digital Organisms // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002. Vol. 17. Pp. 528–532.

75. Wilke, C. O., et al. Evolution of Digital Organisms at High Mutation Rates Leads to Survival of the Flattest // Nature. 2001. Vol. 412. Pp. 331–333.

76. Yegorova, M. A., Kozhevina, O. V. The Role of a Cryptocurrency in the System of Objects of Civil Law Rights // Actual Problems of Russian Law [Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava]. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 81–91. (in rus)

77. Zorkin, V. D. The Law of the Future in the Era of Numbers: Individual Freedom or a Strong State? [Pravo budushchego v ehpokhu tsifr: Individual’naya svoboda ili sil’noe gosudarstvo?] // Russian Newspaper [Rossiiskaya gazeta]. 2020. Dated 15.04.2020. No. 83 (8137) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://rg.ru/2020/04/15/zorkin-pravo-budushchego-eto-te-zhe-vechnye-cennosti-svobody-i-spravedlivosti.html (Accedd date: 25.02.2021). (in rus)


Review

For citations:


Razuvaev N.V. Digital Transformation of Subjective Civil Rights: Problems and Prospects. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2021;(1):18-38. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-1-18-38

Views: 1483


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)