Theoretical and Legal Approach to Assessing the Outcome and Efficiency of Public Administration in the Sphere of Scientific and Technological Development of Russia
EDN: LJBYSO
Abstract
Introduction. This article presents a theoretical and legal analysis of how the performance and efficiency of public administration in the field of science and technology (S&T) are regulated in the Russian Federation, framing this assessment as a tool for achieving technological leadership.
Methodology and materials. The study employs a combination of methods, including the dialectical approach, analysis (comparative, structural-functional, content analysis), synthesis, and systematization, as well as specific legal methods (formal-dogmatic and formal-legal). These were used to examine doctrinal sources, strategic planning documents, and federal legislation on S&T development. Legal modeling and legal-technical methods were applied to substantiate a conceptual framework for the legal regulation of performance and efficiency evaluation, including its core categories and key indicators.
Results and discussion. A comparative analysis of doctrinal sources, strategic planning documents, and federal legislation reveals the absence of a unified legal definition for the core concept of “scientific and technological development” in Russian law. The study identifies contradictions in the terminology used across key federal laws and substantiates a conceptual approach to defining public administration in the S&T sphere, its performance, and efficiency. Key problems in the current assessment framework are highlighted, namely: the lack of clear legal regulations for evaluating public administration in the S&T field, and the misalignment of existing performance indicators with the specific goals of S&T development.
Conclusion. The authors propose formal definitions of concepts essential for building a legal framework to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of S&T development and its public administration. An analysis of indicators in strategic planning documents demonstrates the need for their revision to focus on ensuring genuine scientific and technological progress — defined as a qualitative and irreversible shift in the state of science and technology that secures Russia’s technological leadership. A revised set of indicators is substantiated accordingly.
Supporting agencies: This article was prepared within the framework of the state assignment of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration for 2025.
About the Author
A. A. Teslenko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandra A. Teslenko, Research Intern at the Center for Public Administration Technologies of the Institute of Applied Economic Research
Moscow
References
1. Alekseev, S. S. (1966) The mechanism of legal regulation in a socialist state. Yuridicheskaya literatura. 187 p. (In Russ.)
2. Belyakov, G. P., Kochemaskin, A. N. (2014) The Notion and the Economic Essence of Scholarly Technological Development (Russia, Krasnoyarsk). Problems of modern economics. No. 1 (49). Pp. 38–41. (In Russ.)
3. Berezina, E. A. (2021) Methodological and technological aspects of the evaluation of legal regulation effectiveness. Philosophy of Law. No. 1 (96). Pp. 153–158. (In Russ.)
4. Glazunova, N. I. (2003) Public administration system: Textbook for universities. Unity. (In Russ.)
5. Yefremov, A. A. (2023) Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of stimulating the development of the information technology industry in Russia: Status and prospects. Public Administration Issues. No. 4. Pp. 71–99. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-4-71-99
6. Zenin, I. A. (1980) Structure, functions and conditions for the effectiveness of civil legislation in the field of scientific and technological progress: diss. ... doctor of Law. (In Russ.)
7. Kamalova, G. G. (2024) National technological sovereignty in the sphere of digital technologies: issues of legal support. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). No. 10 (122). Pp. 52–60. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2024.122.10.052-060
8. Kuznetsova, S. A. (2013) On the Question of the Definition of “Legal Mechanism”. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 1 (57). Pp. 9–12. (In Russ.) EDN: QBBDUN
9. Mazilov, E. A., Sakhanevich, D. Yu. (2020) The Factors of Scientific and Technological Space. Territorial Development Issues. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 1–15 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2020.4.54.1
10. Kurochkin, S. A. (2020) The Effectiveness of Legal Norms as a Condition for the Usefulness of Legal Impact (Based on the Norms of Procedural Law). Uchenye zapiski kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Vol. 162. No. 2. Pp. 69–83. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.2.69-83
11. Lezlikova, Ya. V. (2020) Some aspects of the concept of the effectiveness of law. Young scientist. No. 41 (331). Pp. 110-112. (In Russ.
12. Pavlova, I. Yu. (2025) Technological sovereignty and criteria for classifying products as innovative. Law and Right. No. 3. Pp. 151–159. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24412/2073-3313-2025-3-151-159
13. Ponomarenko, E. V. (2024) Technological sovereignty of Russia: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. Vol. 248. No. 4. Pp. 580–590. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.38197/2072- 2060-2024-248-4-580-590
14. Pospelova, E. A., Kazakova, M. V. (2015) Barriers to Implementing New Public Management Principles in Public Systems of Developing Countries. Financial Journal. No. 1 (23). Pp. 99–110. (In Russ.)
15. Rogacheva, O. S. (2011) Efficiency of Administrative-Delict Law Norms. Voronezh. (In Russ.)
16. Sutuzhko, V. V. (2008) Structure, Principles, and Classification of the Concept of “Assessment”. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pp. 108-124. (In Russ.)
17. Sukharev, O. S. (2024) Technological Sovereignty of Russia: formation on the basis of the development of the “knowledge economy” sector. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. No. 1. Pp. 47– 64. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_47_64
18. Tikhomirov, Yu. A. (2017) Law enforcement: from episodic to the target performance. Journal of Russian Law. No. 1 (241). Pp. 55–62. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/23702
19. Yuzhakov, V. N., Startsev, Y. Y., Starostina, A. N. (2023) Development as a resource of public administration resource for solving economic and social problems of citizens and businesses: practice and prospects for use. RANEPA. URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w202369.pdf (In Russ.)
20. Yuzhakov, V. N., Talapina, E. V., Dobrolyubova, E. I., Tikhomirov, Yu. A. (2020) Initiative draft law on ensuring the quality of public administration. Delo. 149 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Teslenko A.A. Theoretical and Legal Approach to Assessing the Outcome and Efficiency of Public Administration in the Sphere of Scientific and Technological Development of Russia. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2025;(4):102-114. (In Russ.) EDN: LJBYSO
Views:
21
Email this article 