The Legal Nature of Subordinate Organizations as Objects of Anti-Corruption Regulation
EDN: UDQSPG
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines the essence and legal status of “organizations created to perform tasks assigned to federal government agencies” as objects of anti-corruption regulation. Individual defects in law enforcement in this area are identified and analyzed.
Methodology and materials. This study is based on a substantive analysis of applicable sources of national legal regulation of anti-corruption activities in relation to the above-mentioned organizations, acts of “soft law” — methodological materials and official explanations issued by authorized state authorities, and current scientific research. At the same time, the purpose of this study is directly to determine the legal nature of such organizations in the context of national anticorruption regulation.
Research results and their discussion. The examination and substantive analysis of the array of normative and scientific research material on the specified topic made it possible to identify the problem of not always proper distribution to the relevant organizations as a whole and their employees of the system of restrictions, prohibitions and obligations established for the purpose of combating corruption, other related obligations, as well as the implementation of the possibility of applying measures of responsibility for committed offenses, which is associated with the legal uncertainty of the perception and identification of these organizations.
Conclusions. In the course of the conducted research, systemic identifying criteria (features) of “organizations created to perform tasks assigned to federal government bodies” were formulated, on the basis of which a corresponding definition was proposed that is valuable for representatives of law enforcement agencies, federal executive bodies involved in law enforcement practice and/or regulation of this area, and employees of the relevant organizations.
About the Author
V. N. ChurkinRussian Federation
Vladislav N. Churkin - graduate student of the School of Digital Law and Bio-Law of the Faculty of Law; expert at the Institute of Compliance and Business Ethics of the Higher School of Law and Administration
Moscow
References
1. Gutnikov, O. V. (2015) Features of Legal Status of Organizations, Established Pursuant to Federal Laws, and Organizations, Established for Fulfillment of Tasks, Assigned to Federal State Bodies. Journal of Russian Law. No. 2 (18). Pp. 44–57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/7573
2. Khabrieva, T. Ya. (Eds) (2018) Scientific-Practical Commentary of the Federal Law No. 273-FZ, December 25, 2008 “On Combating Corruption” (Itemized). The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. 424 p. (In Russ.) EDN: DHEIXH
3. Tukhvatullin, T. A. (2023) Countering Corruption in Organizations: Uncertainty of the Law on Necessary and Sufficient Preventive Measures and the Best Anti-Corruption Practices in Russian Companies. Actual Problems of Russian law. No. 5 (150). Pр. 45–55. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2023.150.5.045-055. EDN: MECAKP
4. Khusnutdinov, F. G. (2021) A State Authority and a Government Authority: The Correlation of Concepts. State Power and Local Self-government. No. 10. Pp. 20–24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/1813-1247-2021-10-20-24
5. Cherkasov, K.V. (2008) On the question of the relationship between the concepts of “body of the state authority” and “government body”. Gaps in Russian legislation. The Legal Journal. No. 2. Pp. 84–85. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Churkin V.N. The Legal Nature of Subordinate Organizations as Objects of Anti-Corruption Regulation. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2025;(2):60-70. (In Russ.) EDN: UDQSPG