Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Abuse of Law in International Arbitration

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-73-82

EDN: MQUWJX

Abstract

The article deals with the phenomenon of abuse of law in international arbitration that seems to be an extremely relevant subject for study due to the development of transnational economic relations. At the same time, various types of abuse in arbitration make us think about developing a certain classification of all cases of abuse of law. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively consider the types of abuse of law in international arbitration and the prospects for countering such abuses, as well as to develop a theoretical basis for such countering based on world experience. In this study, the delay in the process, challenging the competence of arbitration, abuse of information disclosure and exchange of documents, the transfer of the assets of debtor to affiliates or third parties, a fraudulent application for bankruptcy of the debtor, as well as lies to arbitrators and fake evidence were considered. At the same time, the article notes the problem of the lack of mandatory ethical standards in international arbitration and the insufficient powers of arbitrators in the process. The authors conclude that it is necessary to continue work on ethical codes of conduct. In addition, it is concluded that it is necessary to apply liability measures and “procedural sanctions”. In this regard, we are ready for regulatory changes and the implementation of the “ethical review”, that is necessary for positive changes in arbitration.

About the Authors

D. M. Maksimov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Dmitry M. Maksimov, Deputy Director of the School of Legal Regulation of Business of the Faculty of Law

Moskow



P. K. Pakshin
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Pavel K. Pakshin, Directorate for Scientific Projects

Moskow



References

1. Asoskov, A. V. (2011) Commentary on the Rules of Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators. International Commercial Arbitration Review. No. 1, pp. 142–171 (in Russ.).

2. Bergmann, V. (2016) Civil procedural code of Germany. 2nd ed. Rev. Infotropic Media. P. 388 (in Russ.).

3. Berdova, I. A., Ginzburg, I. V. (2017) Abuse of procedural rights in civil proceedings. World of science and education. No. 2 (10), p. 2 (in Russ.).

4. Bugaevsky, A. A. (1909) Lies in Civil Court. Law: Weekly Legal Newspaper. No. 12, рp. 733–742 (in Russ.).

5. Grebelsky, A. V. (2015) Testimony in International Commercial Arbitration. Economy and Law. No. 10, pp. 73–86 (in Russ.).

6. Molchanov, V. V. (2010) On Liability in Civil Proceedings. Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. No. 10, pp. 28–31 (in Russ.).

7. Ochirova, S. (2018) The unbiased nature of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration: approaches to evaluation. International Justice. No. 1 (25), pp. 122–134 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2018-1-122-134

8. Sultanov, A. R. (2019) Lies, integrity in civil law and proceedings. Eurasian advocacy. No. 5 (42), pp. 62–66 (in Russ.).

9. Ahuja, N. G. (2022) Mechanisms to Control Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration. Springer Nature. Pp. 177–221.

10. Bishop, R. D. (2011) Advocacy and Ethics in International Arbitration: Ethics in International Arbitration. Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times. ICCA Congress Series. No. 15, pp. 383–390.

11. Born, G. B. (2014) International Commercial Arbitration. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 1775 p.

12. Gautam, O., Sen, S. (2020) Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration: Use of Party-Appointed Experts. Manupatra. Pp. 1–2.

13. Park, W. W. (2001) Arbitration’s Discontents. Arbitration International. No. 17(3), pp. 263–274. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011234817625

14. Rogers, C. A. (2013) Guerilla Tactics and Ethical Regulation. Kluwer International, Penn State Law Research Paper. No. 23. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2260568 (date of access: 07.02.2024).

15. Sussman, E., Ebere, S. (2011) All’s fair in love and war — or is it? Reflections on ethical standards for counsel in international arbitration. The American Review of International Arbitration. No. 7 (2), pp. 611–623.


Review

For citations:


Maksimov D.M., Pakshin P.K. Abuse of Law in International Arbitration. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2024;(2):73-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-73-82. EDN: MQUWJX

Views: 309


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)