Constitutional Legislation Developments in the Russian Federation for Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract
The improvement of constitutional legislation at the national level is impossible without taking into account the progressive transformations in the international system that predetermine progress in solving the political problems of our time. Democracy as a non-alternative political regime and the rule of law as the principle of social organization guarantee the legitimacy of decisions of the public authority of the state as long as the level of legal culture of the people allows you to remain within the legal framework, updating the interpretation of formal requirements of the constitutional law. The historical context of the modernization of the legal foundations of the state system affects legal awareness only to the extent that changes in the law give rise to progressive practices of human rights protection. Many ambitious political projects and current reforms have not been properly developed due to the fact that the practical results of the modernization of the constitutional system strongly contradicted the picture of social justice that formed the ideological basis for the humanitarian policy. Preserving legal traditions while updating the interpretation of the provisions of constitutional acts in the practice of constitutional justice can contribute to the achievement of sustainable development goals to a much greater extent than those changes in the text of constitutional acts that carry the risks of political instability and violation of human rights.
About the Authors
V. P. Kirilenko
North-West Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor P. Kirilenko Doctor of Sciences, Professor
Sankt Petersburg
G. V. Alekseev
North-West Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgy V. Alekseev PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor
Sankt Petersburg
References
1. Avakyan S. A. Modernization of Public and Political Relationships and Constitutional Reformation: Issues and Prospects // Constitutional and Municipal Law [Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo]. 2019. № 9. P. 3–6. (In rus)
2. Avakyan S. A. Government Relations: Existence Regularities, Regulation and Law Enforcement Subjectivism // Constitutional and Municipal Law [Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo]. 2018. № 5. P. 3–11. (In rus)
3. Avakyan S. A. Problems of Ensuring Constitutional Public-Political Rights and Freedoms of Citizens of the Russian Federation: New Realities // Moscow University Herald. Iss. 11: Law. [Problemy obespecheniya konstitutsionnykh publichno-politicheskikh prav i svobod grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii: novyye real’nosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo]. 2017. № 1. P. 3–34. (In rus)
4. Zenkin S. A. Modernization of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Normative Model and Practice [Modernizatsiya konstitutsii rossiyskoy federatsii: normativnaya model’ i praktika] // Lex russica (Russian law) [Lex russica (Russkiy zakon)]. 2018. № 11 (144). P. 40–62. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.144.11.040-062. (In rus)
5. Zorkin V. D. The Letter and Spirit of the Constitution [Bukva i dukh konstitutsii] // Russian newspaper [Rossiyskaya gazeta]. 09.10.2018. № 226 (7689). (In rus)
6. Kirilenko V. P., Alekseev G. V., Pacek M. Natural Law and the Crisis of Liberal Legal Order // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Law [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo.] 2019. Т. 10. № 1. P. 38-54. DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2019.103. (In rus)
7. Mau V. A., Abramov A. E., Apevalova E. A., et al. Russian Economy in 2018. Trends and Prospects [Rossiyskaya ekonomika v 2018 godu. Tendentsii i perspektivy]. Moscow, 2019. Т. 40. (In rus)
8. Ovsepyan Zh. I. Changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Some Trends [Izmeneniya v Konstitutsiyu RF: nekotoryye tendentsii] // Russian law: Education, Practice, Science [Rossiyskoye pravo: obrazovaniye, praktika, nauka]. 2014. № 2 (83). P. 79–83. (In rus)
9. Temirbekov Zh. Magna Carta — as the Conceptual Predecessor of the Rule of Law Concept in the Middle Ages // Law and State [Pravo i gosudarstvo]. № 2 (67) 2015. P. 89–92. (In rus)
10. Filatov S. A. Does Russia Live by Constitution? [Zhivet li Rossiya po konstitutsii?] // Banner [Znamya]. P. 115–121. (In rus)
11. Khatunov S. Yu. Magna Carta and Treaty of Henry Brackton “On the Laws and Customs of England” [Velikaya khartiya vol’nostey i Traktat Genri Braktona “O zakonakh i obychayakh Anglii”] // Lex russica (Russian law) [Lex russica (Russkiy zakon)]. 2012. Т. 71. № 1. (In rus)
12. Shahray S. M. 25 Years of the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Implementation and Development of Constitutional Models // Lex Russica (Russian law) [Lex russica (Russkiy zakon)]. 2018. № 11 (144). P. 9–15. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2018.144.11.009-015. (In rus)
13. Shahray S. M. Creative Potential of the Constitution of the Russian Federation // Journal of Russian Law. 2018. № 12 (264). P. 33–39. DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_12_3. (In rus)
14. Ebzeev B. S. Constitution, Power and Freedom in Russia: the Experience of Synthetic Research [Konstitutsiya, vlast’ i svoboda v Rossii: opyt sinteticheskogo issledovaniya]. М. : Prospekt, 2013. 336 p. (In rus)
15. O’Cinneide C. Democracy, Rights and the Constitution — New Directions in the Human Rights Era // Current Legal Problems. Vol. 57. Iss. 1. 2004. P. 175–211. DOI: 10.1093/clp/57.1.175.
16. Çalı B. International Human Rights Law: One Purpose or Many? Reflections on Macklem’s The Sovereignty of Human Rights // Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies. Vol. 15. Iss. 1. June 2017. P. 77–88. DOI: 10.1093/jrls/jlx010.
17. Tasioulas J. Human Rights, Legitimacy, and International Law // The American Journal of Jurisprudence. Vol. 58. Iss. 1. June 2013. P. 1–25. DOI: 10.1093/ajj/aut001.
Review
For citations:
Kirilenko V.P., Alekseev G.V. Constitutional Legislation Developments in the Russian Federation for Sustainable Development Goals. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2020;(1):36-43.
Views:
547
Email this article 