Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Fictitious (Implied) Administrative Acts: Prospects of Integration Into Russian Legislation

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-3-61-70

Abstract

The article analyses the category of a fictitious administrative act. It is pointed out that the term “fictitious administrative act” borrowed from German administrative law is not appropriate for Russian law. As a substitute for it, another term is offered — “implied administrative act”. It is argued that the implied administrative act, being a legal fiction, is not an administrative act in the proper sense of the word. Consequently, although the rules on the invalidity of administrative acts may be applied to implied administrative acts, not all grounds of invalidity may be applicable to them. As a result of the analysis of foreign legislation, possible models of using of implied administrative act are presented. The paper demonstrates that the legislator can establish a positive or negative fictitious conclusion either as a general rule or in relation to individual administrative procedures. The objectives of introducing the category in question into the legislation are also determined. The article shows that the goals of normative fixation and the use of positive and negative fictitious conclusion in legal practice are different. The purpose of a negative fictitious conclusion is to eliminate the state of legal uncertainty in cases where challenging the inaction of an administrative body for one reason or another is difficult. At the same time, a positive fictitious conclusion generally leads to simplification and acceleration of administrative procedures and contributes to procedural savings. Taking into account foreign experience, the paper concludes that it is advisable to introduce a positive implied administrative act into Russian legislation to simplify and speed up administrative procedures. General recommendations on possible ways of its introduction are given, in particular, it is indicated that it is unacceptable to establish such a condition as a general rule.

About the Author

V. V. Maslov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Maslov, postgraduate student

Nizhniy Novgorod



References

1. Baranov, V. M., Pershin, V. B., Pershina, I. V. Legal Fiction as a Scientific Problem: Critical Notes on R. K. Lotfullin’s Monograph “Legal Fictions in Civil Law” [Yuridicheskaya fiktsiya kak nauchnaya problema: kriticheskie zametki na monografiyu R. K. Lotfullina “Yuridicheskie fiktsii v grazhdanskom prave”]. Legal technique [Yuridicheskaya tekhnika]. 2007. No. 1. P. 266–276. (In Rus.)

2. Belov, V. A. Civil Law : in 4 vols. Volume II. The general part in 2 books. Book 2. Facts + additional material in EBS: textbook for universities [Grazhdanskoe parvo : v 4 t. Tom II. Obshchaya chast’ v 2 kn. Kn. 2. Fakty + dopmaterial v EBS: uchebnik dlya vuzov]. 2nd ed., reprint. and additional M.: Yurayt Publishing House [Izdatel’stvo Yurayt], 2022. 497 p. (In Rus.)

3. Vasiliev, R. F. Management Acts (Meaning, Research Problem, Concept) [Akty upravleniya (Znachenie, problema issledovaniy, ponyatie)]. M., 1987. 141 p. (In Rus.)

4. Gambaryan, A., Muradyan, M., Shakaryan, T. Silence of the Administrative Body and Fictitious Administrative Acts [Molchanie administrativnogo organa i fiktivnye administrativnye akty]. Yearbook of Public Law 2021: instruments of action of administrative bodies [Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava 2021: instrumenty deystviya administrativnykh organov]. M., Infotropik Media, 2021. P. 160–190. (In Rus.)

5. Gambaryan, A. Legal Regimes of Silence and Fictitious Conclusions Arising From It [Pravovye rezhimy molchaniya i fiktivnykh vyvodov, vytekayushchikh iz nego]. Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava]. 2019. No. 12. P. 19–29. (In Rus.)

6. Davydov, K. V. Administrative Procedures: The Concept of Legal Regulation: dis. ... Doctor of Law [Administrativnye protsedury: kontseptsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2020. 655 p. (In Rus.)

7. Evtihiev, A. F. The Legal Force of Administrative Acts [Zakonnaya sila aktov administratsii]. Lublin: Gubernia type, 1911. 292 p. (In Rus.)

8. Elistratov, A. I. The Basic Principles of Administrative Law [Osnovnye nachala administrativnogo prava]. M.: G. A. Lehman Publishing house, 1914. 332 p. (In Rus.)

9. Cassia, P. Implied Decisions in the Administrative Law of France. Administrative Procedures and Control in the Light of European Experience [Podrazumevaemye resheniya v administrativnom prave Frantsii. Administrativnye protsedury i kontrol’ v svete evropeyskogo opyta]. Moscow: Statute, 2011. P. 194–219. (In Rus.)

10. Kuryndin, P. A. The French Doctrine of Implied (Implicit) Administrative Acts and Prospects for Its Application in the Russian Federation [Frantsuzskaya doktrina podrazumevaemykh (implitsitnykh) administrativnykh aktov i perspektivy ee primeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii]. Actual Problems of Russian Law [Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava]. 2015. No. 2 (51). P. 35–40. (In Rus.)

11. Lazarev, V. V. Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Universities. 5th ed., correct. and add. [Teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik dlya vuzov. 5-e izd., ispr. i dop]. M.: Yurayt Publishing House, 2022. 521 p. (In Rus.)

12. Lotfullin, R. K. Legal Fictions in Civil Law [Yuridicheskie fiktsii v grazhdanskom prave]. M., 2006. 213 p. (In Rus.)

13. Mikheeva, I. V. Lawmaking of the Ministries of the Russian Empire in the XIX — Early XX Century : monograph [Pravotvorchestvo ministerstv Rossiyskoy imperii v XIX — nachale XX veka : monografiya]. M., 2012. 388 p. (In Rus.)

14. Novoselov, V. I. Legality of Acts of Governing Bodies [Zakonnost’ aktov organov upravleniya]. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1968. 107 p. (In Rus.)

15. Pudelka, Y. Instruments of Action of Public Administration Bodies [Instrumenty deystviya organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya]. Yearbook of Public Law 2021: instruments of action of administrative bodies [Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava 2021: instrumenty deystviya administrativnykh organov]. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 2021. P. 2–23. (In Rus.)

16. Rossinsky, B. V. Administrative Law: Textbook [Administrativnoe parvo : uchebnik. 6-e izd.]. 6th ed., revision. M.: Norma, INFRA-M, 2020. 640 p. (In Rus.)

17. Starilov, Yu. N. Course of General Administrative Law. In 3 vols. Vol. II: Public Service. Managerial actions. Legal acts of management. Administrative Justice [Kurs obshchego administrativnogo prava. V 3 t. T. II: Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. Upravlencheskie deystviya. Pravovye akty upravleniya. Administrativnaya yustitsiya]. M.: NORMA, 2002. 600 p. (In Rus.)

18. Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Universities [Teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik dlya vuzov] / V. K. Babayev [et al.]; edited by V. K. Babayev. 4th ed., reprint. and additional. M.: Yurayt Publishing House, 2020. 582 p. (In Rus.)

19. Tomtosov, A. A. Administrative Act in Russian Public Law [Administrativnyy akt v rossiyskom publichnom prave]. M.: Infotropik Media, 2020. 160 p. (In Rus.)

20. Khvan, L. Administrative Silence in the Law on Administrative Procedures: On the Issue of Legal Qualification and the Model of Regulatory Regulation [Administrativnoe molchanie v zakone ob administrativnykh protsedurakh: k voprosu o pravovoy kvalifikatsii i modeli normativnoy regulyatsii]. Yearbook of Public Law 2021: instruments of action of administrative bodies [Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava 2021: instrumenty deystviya administrativnykh organov]. M.: Infotropik Media, 2021. P. 148–159. (In Rus.)

21. Chenerelli, A. Administrative Procedures in Italian Law [Administrativnye protsedury v ital’yanskom prave]. Bulletin of the O. E. Kutafin University (MGUA) [Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA)]. 2019. No. 6. P. 165–172. (In Rus.)

22. Batalli, М. Consequences of Administrative Silence in Public Administration. Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe. 2017. Vol. 20: Future labour market challenges: digitalisation and Brexit. No. 1. Р. 139–152.

23. Caspar, J. Der fiktive Verwaltungsakt — Zur Systematisierung eines aktuellen verwaltungsrechtlichen Instituts / Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts — 125 / Kleine Beiträge 23. S. 131–153.

24. Jansen, O. Silence of the Administration. Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper. 2015. № 2015-03.

25. Parisio, V. The Italian Administrative Procedure Act and Public Authorities’ Silence. Hamline law review: Vol. 36. Iss. 1, Article 2 (2013).

26. Pérez, M. G. El silencio administrativo en España. Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales. 2013. Vol. 6. No. 6. Р. 57–83.

27. Siegel, Th. Allgemeines Vervaltungsrecht. 14. Aufl. (e-book). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2022. 2560 s.


Review

For citations:


Maslov V.V. Fictitious (Implied) Administrative Acts: Prospects of Integration Into Russian Legislation. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2022;(3):61-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-3-61-70

Views: 337


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)