Legal Understanding of Partnership between Entrepreneurs and Public Authorities in Russia
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-3-53-60
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the unresolved issue of the nature of the partnership between entrepreneurs and authorities, which in practice generates litigations. The article analyzes the use of the term “partnership of entrepreneurs and authorities” in legislation based on methodological prerequisites. The author presents theoretical developments in the field of research of the concept of “partnership” in philosophical, economic and legal science. The author attempts to identify the term “partnership of entrepreneurs and authorities”. The local legislation prior to enforcement of law on PPP is considered as taking into account the variety of forms of such partnerships. The author underline the practical significance of the term “partnership of entrepreneurs and authorities”. The author gives the definition of the term “partnership of entrepreneurs and authorities”.
About the Author
I. S. Sushilnikov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya S. Sushilnikov, postgraduate student
Moscow
References
1. Ignatyuk, N. A. Public-Private Partnership in Russia [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v Rossii]. Law and Economics [Pravo i ekonomika], 2006. No. 8. P. 3–8. (In Rus.)
2. Prokofiev, S. Some Aspects of the Definition of the Concepts of Partnership and Interaction in Establishing Relations Between Government and Business [O nekotorykh aspektakh opredeleniya ponyatiy «partnerstvo» i «vzaimodeystvie» v ustanovlenii otnosheniy vlasti i biznesa]. Problems of Theory and Practice of Management [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya]. No. 1. 2019. P. 8–14. (In Rus.)
3. Sukhar, A. A. Political Partnership in Modern Russia [Politicheskoe partnerstvo v sovremennoy Rossii]. Philosophy of Law [Filosofiya prava]. No. 1. 2007. P. 63–65. (In Rus.)
4. Shchetinina, O. V. Philosophy of an Active Turn in Social Policy: Priorities of Social Partnership Technologies [Filosofiya aktivnogo povorota v sotsial’noy politike: prioritety tekhnologiy sotsial’nogo partnerstva]. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii]. 2021. No. 1 (53). P. 294–296. (In Rus.)
5. Boccacin, L. Progettare e realizzare partnership sociali nei servizi alla famiglia: un’analisi comparata dei tre studi di caso. In G. Rossi e L. Boccacin (a cura di), Capitale sociale e partnership tra pubblico, privato e Terzo Settore, Milano, FrancoAngeli. 2007. P. 152–173.
6. Castañer, X., Oliveira, N. Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Between Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review // Journal of Management, 2020. 46 (6). P. 965–1001.
7. Dermot, M. Husserl and Gurwitsch on Horizonal Intentionality. The Gurwitch Memorial Lecture 2018. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 2019. P. 40.
8. Ditlhake, K. J. Multidisciplinary Community Development: A Substantive Theory for Community Partnerships processes. African Journal of Governance and Development, 2022. 11 (1.1). P. 164–189.
9. Drummond, J. J. Forms of Social Unity: Partnership, Membership, and Citizenship. Husserl Studies 18. 2002. P. 141– 156.
10. Long, F. J., Arnold, M. B. The Power of Environmental Partnerships. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press, 1995. 338 p.
11. Mérini, C. Le partenariat: Instrument Juridique et/ou Politique, le Cas de l’OSCE. Revue Québécoise de droit international, 1995. Vol. 9. P. 21–34.
12. Mostepanuik, A. The Development of the Public-Private Partnership Concept in Economics Theory. Advances in Applied Sociology, 2016. No. 6. P. 375–388.
13. Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques. Glossaire des principaux termes relatifs à l’évaluation et la gestion axée sur les résultats, Groupe de travail du CAD sur l’évaluation de l’aide. 2nd ed. DCD/DAC/EV (2022) 2. 2022. 30 p.
14. Osborne, S., Murray V. Understanding the Process of Public-private Partnerships. In S. Osborne, Public-Private Partnerships. London and New York, Routledge (ed.), 2000. P. 70–83.
15. Määttä, S., Lützén, K., Öresland, S. Contract Theories and Partnership in Health Care. A Philosophical Inquiry to the Philosophy of John Rawls and Seyla Benhabib. Nursing Philosophy, 2017. P. 18.
Review
For citations:
Sushilnikov I.S. Legal Understanding of Partnership between Entrepreneurs and Public Authorities in Russia. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2022;(3):53-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-3-53-60
Views:
265
Email this article 