Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

Legal Personality of an “Electronic Person”: Theoretical Analysis

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-2-50-58

Abstract

The article is devoted to the question of the possibility of using existing concepts of legal personality in the construction of the legal status of artificial intelligence (AI). The article examines the properties of AI in comparison with individuals and legal entities, and concludes that the full use of their legal personality as a legal basis for the electronic person’s legal personality is incorrect. Separately it’s considered the issue of the AI’s responsibility. The paper focuses on the prevention of mixing the concepts of the object and subject of law in relation to AI, identifies trends in the development of legal regulation of its legal personality, and concludes that in these modern conditions, the “electronic person” is closest in its content to the concept of “quasi-entity”.

About the Author

E. S. Tiutcheva
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Evgeniya S. Tiutcheva, candidate for a master’s degree

Kazan



References

1. Gadzhiev, G. A. Is Robot Agent a Person? (Search for Legal Forms to Regulate the Digital Economy) [Yavlyaetsya li robot-agent licom? (Poisk pravovyh form dlya regulirovaniya cifrovoj ekonomiki)]. Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava], 2018. No. 1, P. 15–30. (In Rus.)

2. Ioseliani, A. D. “Artificial Intelligence” vs Human Intelligence [Iskusstvennyj intellekt vs chelovecheskij razum]. Manuskript [Manuskript], 2019. Vol. 12. P. 102–107. (In Rus.)

3. Krysanova, N. V. On the Issue of Legal Personality and Legal Development of Artificial Intelligence [K voprosu o pravosub”ektnosti i pravovom razvitii iskusstvennogo intellekta]. Social sciences and humanities. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 4: State and Law. Abstract journal [Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo. Referativnyj zhurnal], 2021. № 1. P. 23–31. (In Rus.)

4. Laptev, V. A. Artificial Intelligence and Liability for Its Work [Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu]. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics [Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki], 2019. No. 2. P. 79–102. (In Rus.)

5. Morkhat, P. M. To the Question of the Legal Personality of an “Electronic Person” [K voprosu o pravosub”ektnosti “elektronnogo lica”]. Legal research [Yuridicheskie issledovaniya], 2018. No. 4. P. 1–7. (In rus)

6. Morkhat, P. M. The Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Intellectual Property Law: Civil Law Problems [Pravosub”ektnost’ iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti: grazhdanskopravovye problem]. Thesis. ... Cand. of Law Sciences. M., 2018.

7. Morkhat, P. M. The Legal Personality of the Artificial Intelligence Unit: Some Civil Law Approaches [Pravosub”ektnost’ yunita iskusstvennogo intellekta: nekotorye grazhdansko-pravovye podhody]. Bulletin of Kostroma State University [Vestnik Kostromskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta], 2018. No. 3. P. 280–283. (In Rus.)

8. Morkhat, P. M. Artificial Intelligence Unit as Electronic Personality [Yunit iskusstvennogo intellekta kak elektronnoe lico]. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence [Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudenciya], 2018. No. 2. P. 61–73. (In Rus.)

9. Ponomareva, E. V. Subjects and quasi-subjects of law: theoretical and legal problems of differentiation [Sub”ekty i kvazisub”ekty prava: teoretiko-pravovye problemy razgranicheniya]. Thesis. ... Cand. of Law Sciences. Yekaterinburg, 2019. (In Rus.)

10. Shestak, V. A., Volevodz, A. G. Modern requirements of the legal support of artificial intelligence: a view from Russia [Sovremennye potrebnosti pravovogo obespecheniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: vzglyad iz Rossii]. Russian Journal of Criminology [Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal], 2019. Vol. 13. P. 197–206. (In Rus.) DOI:10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).197-206.

11. Yastrebov, O. A. Artificial intelligence in the legal space: conceptual and theoretical approaches [Iskusstvennyj intellekt v pravovom prostranstve: konceptual’nye i teoreticheskie podhody]. Legal personality: general theoretical, sectoral and international legal analysis: collection of materials for the 12th annual scientific readings of the memory of Prof. S. N. Bratus [Pravosub”ektnost’: obshcheteoreticheskij, otraslevoj i mezhdunarodno-pravovoj analiz: sb. materialov k 12-m ezhegod. nauch. chteniyam pamyati prof. S.N. Bratusya]. 2017. P. 271–274. (In Rus.)

12. Bryson, J. J., Diamantis, M. E., Grant, T. D. Of, for, and by the People: the Legal Lacuna of Synthetic Persons [Electronic resource]. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper, 2018. No. 5. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320046311_Of_for_and_by_the_people_the_legal_lacuna_of_synthetic_persons (Access date: 03.02.2022). DOI:10.1007/s10506-017-9214-9.

13. Chopra, S., White, L. Artificial Agents — Personhood in Law and Philosophy [Electronic resource]. ESAI, 2004. URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~schopra/agentlawsub.pdf (Access date: 03.02.2022).

14. Hallevy, G. Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. 262 p.

15. Hubbard, F. P. Do Androids Dream? Personhood and Intelligent Artifacts. Temple Law Review, 2011. Vol. 83. P. 405–474.

16. Krausova, A. Intersections Between Law and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Computer, 2017. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 55–68.

17. Turing, A. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 1950. Vol. 59. No. 236. Р. 433–460.

18. Weitzenboeck, E. M. Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2001. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 204–234.

19. Willick, M. S. Artificial Intelligence: Some Legal Approaches and Implications. AI Magazine, 1983. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 5–16.


Review

For citations:


Tiutcheva E.S. Legal Personality of an “Electronic Person”: Theoretical Analysis. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2022;(2):50-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-2-50-58

Views: 959


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)