Exercise of Civil-Law Rights: Categories in the Context of Their Digitalization
Abstract
With digital rights designated to the objects of civil rights in Art. 128 of the Civil Code, Art. 141.1 amended to include their legal definition, and a new wording of Art. 309 introducing ‘smart contracts’, the digital reform recently enacted in the Russian civil law has seen some major novelties. Needless to say, these accomplishments have challenged Russian civil law theorists. Discussions are underway to resolve both doctrinal and applied issues that had been more than obvious well before the legislative move which, according to one of the opinions, was an ‘admissible’ experiment. What remains now is to assess its viability. The author of this work set the goal to explore the way digital rights, primarily those that arise from ‘smart-contracts’, are (or can be) ‘exercised’. This is a perspective where a fundamental gap between ‘smart-contract’ and civil contract emerges. In the author’s view, efforts to overcome it by expanding the concept of subjective rights and the principles of contract law will not succeed. Since no proper verification of the interests of the parties to ‘smart contracts’, which are essentially a computer code, is available, and as the same refers to linguistic verification of their will, there is no way for ‘smart contracts’ to enter the domain of law. Digital ‘contracts’ are unapt to honour the principle of contractual equilibrium. The ‘self-execution’ of these contracts, as well as their inherent inability to be violated, are, if put in the civilistic context, their fatal flaw, and by no means a virtue. The article also shows that though instruments to ensure a relative irreversibility of rights are not unfamiliar to private law, they cannot serve as an excuse for such regime in contract obligations. That fixation of rights and transactions in digital form has become fully enshrined in the civil law is arguably the only compatible with its principles as well as much anticipated impact the digital reform has brought about.
About the Author
V. L. Volfson
North-West Institute of Management of Russian Presidential Academy of National
Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir L. Volfson, Associate Professor, PhD in Jurisprudence
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Akinfeeva, V. V. Utilitarian Digital Rights in Modern Conditions of Economic Transformation [Utilitarnye tsifrovye prava v sovremennykh usloviyakh transformatsii ehkonomiki]. Perm Law Almanac [Permskii Yuridicheskii Almanakh]. 2020. No. 3. P. 397–407 (in Rus.)
2. Arkhipov, V. V. Is Law Possible in Post-Truth Era? [Vozmozhno li pravo v ehpokhu postpravdy?]. The Law [Zakon]. 2019. No. 12. P. 56–71 (in Rus.)
3. Bagayev, V. A. It Can Be Taken as an Experiment. The Presidential Council for Codification Delved into Digital Rights. [V kachestve experimenta otritsat’ nel’zya. Sovet po kodifikatsii vyayasnyal prirodu tsifrovykh prav]. Zakon.Ru Web-Site [Portal Zakon.ru] [Electronical resource]. URL: https://clck.ru/VmrdS (date of access: 25.06.2021). (in Rus.)
4. Chernokov, A. E. The Future Life of Law (futurological notes) [Budushchnost’ prava (futurologicheskie zametki)]. Spiridonov Readings: Topical Problems of Law Theory. Iss. 1–2. Science ed. I. L. Chestnov. The Publishing House of St. Petersburg Institute of Law named after Prince P. G. Oldenburgsky [Sankt-Peterburgskii institut prava imeni Printsa P. G. Ol’denburgskogo]. P. 114–138. (in Rus.)
5. Gabov, A. V., Khavanova, I. A. Crowdfunding: Legislative Regulation of the Financing Web-Model in the Context of Legal Doctrine and Foreign Experience [Kraudfanding: zakonodatel’noe oformlenie web-modeli v kontekste pravovoy doktriny i zarubezhnogo opyta]. Perm University Herald. Juridical Scienses [Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki]. 2020. Issue 47. P. 28–44. (in Rus.)
6. Endicott, Timothy. Law and Language. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Electronical resource]. URL: https://plato. stanford.edu/entries/law-language/ (date of access: 27.06.2021).
7. Ivanov, N. V. Excersise of Digital Rights according the Civil Code and the Law on Crowdfunding [Osushchestvlenie tsifrovykh prav po GK i Zakonu o kraudfandinge]. Zakon.Ru Web-Site [Portal Zakon.ru] [Electronical resource]. URL: https://clck.ru/Vk9HQ (date of access: 25.06.2021) (in Rus.)
8. Kolber, Adam J. Not-So-Smart Blockchain Contracts and Artificial Responsibility [Electronical resource]. Stanford Technology Law Review. Vol. 21. Issue 2. 198 (2018). P. 198–234. URL: https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2018/09/Kolber_LL_20180910.pdf (date of access: 27.06.2021).
9. Konobeevskaya, I. M. Digital Rights As a New Object of Civil Rights [Tsifrovye prava kak novyi ob’ekt grazhdanskikh prav]. Izvestiya of Saratov University (New Series) [Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta (Novaya Seriya). Ser. Economics. Management. Law. 2019. Vol. 19. Iss. 3. P. 330–334 (in Rus.)
10. Kulakovskii, V. V. Issues of State Registration Ownership on Transformed Immovable Property [Problemy gosudarstvennoi registratsii prava sobstvennosti na transformirovannye nedvizhimye ob”ekty]. Property Relations in the Russian Federation [Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. No. 1 (196). P. 46–49. (in Rus.)
11. Nakomoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System [Electronical resource]. URL: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin. pdf (daye of access 27.06.2021).
12. Novoselova, L. A., Gabov, A. V., Savelev, A. I. and others. Digital Rights — a New Object of the Civil Rights [Tsifrovye prava kak novyi ob”ekt grazhdanskogo prava]. The Law [Zakon]. 2019. No. 5. P. 31–54. (in Rus.)
13. Rozhkova, M. A. Digital Rights: Public Law Concept and the Notion in the Russian Law [Tsifrovye prava: publichnopravovaya kontseptsiya i ponyatie v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave]. Business and Law [Khozyaistvo i pravo]. 2020. No. 10. P. 3–13. (in Rus.)
14. Savelev, A. I. Contract Law 2.0: “Smart Contracts” and the Beginning of the End of the Classic Contract Law [Dogovornoe pravo 2.0: “umnye” kontrakty kak nachalo kontsa klassicheskogo dogovornogo prava]. Civil Law Review [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 32–60. (in Rus.)
15. Savelev, A. I. Some Legal Aspects of Implementation of Smart Contracts and Blockchain Technologies under Russian law [Nekotorye pravovye aspekty ispol’zovaniya smart-kontraktov i blokchein-tekhnologii po rossiiskomu pravu]. The Law [Zakon]. 2017. No. 5. P. 94–117. (in Rus.)
16. Volfson, V. L. Bad Faith as a Diagnosis of Abuse of Law in the Excerscie of Subjective Right [Nedobrosovestnost’ kak diagnoz zloupotrebleniya pravom]. Moscow : Prospect [Prospekt]. 2019. 80 pages. (in Rus.)
17. Volfson, V. L. Correlation of exceptio non adimpleti contractus and clausula rebus sic stantibus as Ways to Restore the Balance of Parties’ Interests: Theory and Modern Developments [Sootnoshenie exceptio non adimpleti contractus i clausula rebus sic stantibus kak sposobov vosstanovleniya balansa interesov: teoriya i sovremennoe razvitie]. Leningrad Legal Journal [Leninradskiy Yuridischeskiy Zhurnal]. 2020. No. 4 (62). P. 95–114. (in Rus.)
18. Volfson, V. L. Features of Abuse of Rights in a Contractual Relationship [Osobennosti zloupotrebleniya pravom v dogovornom pravootnoshenii]. Zakon.Ru Web-Site [Portal Zakon.ru] [Electronical resource]. URL: https://clck.ru/ RyGEB (date of access: 25.06.2021). (in Rus.)
19. Volfson, V. L. Remedies Against Abuse of Rughts in the Russian Civil Law [Protivodeistvie zloupotrebleniyu pravom v rossiiskom grazhdanskom zakonodatel’stve]. Мoscow : Prospect [Prospekt]. 2017. 144 Pages. (in Rus.)
20. Volfson, V. L. The Language of the Dogma: No Detour [Yazyk dogmy: obhod nevozmozhen]. The World of the Legal Science. 2012. No. 6. P. 8–19. (in Rus.)
Review
For citations:
Volfson V.L. Exercise of Civil-Law Rights: Categories in the Context of Their Digitalization. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2021;(3):42-52.
Views:
362
Email this article 