Preview

Theoretical and Applied Law

Advanced search

On the Issue of Pre-Contractual Liability Qualification

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-3-36-41

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the protectability of literary works and their components, expressed in the application of the doctrine of the protected form and unprotected content of a literary work as the main concept in domestic legislation and judicial practice. Within the framework of this article, the distinguished legally significant elements under Russian law, the criteria for their protection are analyzed. The author analyzes the influence of the teachings of I. G. Fichte on the protected form and unprotected content on the provisions of legislative acts regulating copyright protection, as well as cases of granting legal protection based on the criterion of the author’s creative work, for example, in relation to such elements of a literary work as the name and character. 

About the Authors

L. V. Shvarts
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Larisa V. Shvarts, PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor of Department of Law

Saint Petersburg



E. S. Deriabina
Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation

Elizaveta S. Deriabina, Student of the Faculty of Law

Moscow



References

1. Fichte, J. Beweis der Unrechtmäßigkeit des Büchernachdrucks [Electronic resource]. Berliner Monatsschrift. 1793. S. 443–482. URL: http://copy.law.cam.ac.uk/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=record_d_1793 (accessed: 15.05.2021).

2. Gavrilov, E. P. Originality As a Criterion for the Protection of Objects by Copyright [Original’nost’ kak kriterii okhrany ob”ektov avtorskim pravom]. Patents and Licenses [Patenty i litsenzii], 2004. No. 6. P. 45–51. (in Rus.)

3. Gorbunov, A. A. The Problem of Establishing the Properties of Unprotected Ideas in the Context of Cultural Development [Problema ustanovleniya svoistv ne okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom idei v kontekste razvitiya kul’tury]. Ex jure. 2020. No. 3. P. 64–80. (in Rus.)

4. Commentary to the Fourth Part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Kommentarii k chasti chetvertoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii (poglavnyi)] / ed. A. L. Makovsky. M. : Statut, 2008. 225 p. (in Rus.)

5. Rakhmilovich, A. V. The Title of the Work As an Object of Copyright [Nazvanie proizvedeniya kak ob”ekt avtorskogo prava]. Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava]. 2002. No. 11. P. 25–29. (in Rus.)

6. Sergeev, A. P. Intellectual Property Law in the Russian Federation [Pravo intellektual’noi sobstvennosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii]: Textbook. 2nd ed., Rev. and add. M. : OOO “TK Wellbn”. 752 p. (in Rus.)

7. Serebrovsky, V. I. Topics of Soviet Copyright [Voprosy sovetskogo avtorskogo prava]. Respons. ed. P. E. Orlovsky. Moscow : Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1956. 283 p. (in Rus.)

8. Sprigman, Christopher Jon. Copyright and the Rule of Reason (May 5, 2009) [Electronic resource]. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law. Vol. 7, 2009; Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2009-03. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1399522 (accessed: 15.05.2021).


Review

For citations:


Shvarts L.V., Deriabina E.S. On the Issue of Pre-Contractual Liability Qualification. Theoretical and Applied Law. 2021;(3):36-41. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-3-36-41

Views: 337


ISSN 3034-2813 (Online)