talТеоретическая и прикладная юриспруденцияTheoretical and Applied Law3034-2813СЗИУ РАНХиГСBURRVAtal-561Research ArticleСТАТЬИARTICLESКитайские государственные компании в международном инвестиционном арбитражеChinese State-Owned Entities in International Investment Arbitrationhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-4195АндрееваН. С.AndreevaN. S.

 Андреева Наталья Сергеевна - старший юрист практики разрешения споров; аспирант департамента правового регулирования бизнеса факультета права

Москва 

 Natalia S. Andreeva - postgraduate student of the School of Legal Regulation of Business of the Faculty of Law; Senior Associate at Dispute Resolution Practice 

Moscow

nat.s.andreeva@gmail.comНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»; ООО «Кучер Кулешов Максименко и партнеры»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of Economics; Kucher Kuleshov Maximenko & Partners LLCRussian Federation20252006202502139147Copyright © Андреева Н.С., 20252025Андреева Н.С.Andreeva N.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.taljournal.ru/jour/article/view/561

В последнее десятилетие китайские государственные компании всё чаще инвестируют за рубеж в рамках имплементации инициативы Правительства Китайской Народной Республики «Пояс и путь» и стратегического плана «Сделано в Китае 2025». В связи с увеличением объема инвестиций растет и риск нарушения прав китайских государственных инвесторов. В данной статье автор исследует вопрос о том, есть ли право у китайских государственных компаний, контролируемых Китайской Народной Республикой, инициировать международный инвестиционный арбитраж против принимающего государства, и приходит к выводу о том, что для ответа на этот вопрос необходимо установить, реализовывала ли фактически компания государственную функцию в рамках конкретного инвестиционного проекта.

Over the past decade, Chinese state-owned entities have increasingly invested abroad as part of the implementation of the People’s Republic of China Government’s Belt and Road Initiative and the “Made in China 2025” strategic plan. As the volume of investment increases, the risk of infringement of Chinese state-owned investors’ rights is also growing. In this article, the author analyzes whether Chinese state-owned companies controlled by the People’s Republic of China have the right to initiate international investment arbitration against the host state, and concludes that to answer this question it is necessary to analyze the circumstances of investment in each specific investment project.

китайские государственные компанииинвестициимеждународные инвестиционные соглашенияМеждународный центр по урегулированию инвестиционных споровChinese state-owned companiesinvestmentinternational investment agreementsInternational Center for Settlement of Investment DisputesВ научной работе использованы результаты стратегического проекта «Правовые механизмы преодоления неравенства», выполненного в рамках проектной научно-исследовательской деятельности факультета права НИУ ВШЭ в 2023–2024 уч. году This research paper uses the results of the strategic project “Legal Mechanisms for Overcoming Inequality”, carried out as part of the project research activities of the Faculty of Law of the National Research University Higher School of Economics in 2023–2024 academic year.ReferencesBroches, A. (1995) Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and other subjects of public and private international law. Pp. 201–202.Broches, A. (1995) Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and other subjects of public and private international law. Pp. 201–202.Cortesi, G. A. (2017) ICSID Jurisdiction with Regard to State-Owned Enterprises — Moving Toward an Approach Based on General International Law. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. Vol. 16, No. 1. Pp. 108–138. DOI: 10.1163/15718034-12341344Cortesi, G. A. (2017) ICSID Jurisdiction with Regard to State-Owned Enterprises — Moving Toward an Approach Based on General International Law. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. Vol. 16, No. 1. Pp. 108–138. DOI: 10.1163/15718034-12341344Du, M. (2022) The Status of Chinese State-owned Enterprises in International Investment Arbitration: Much Ado about Nothing? Chinese Journal of International Law. Pp. 785–815. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmab040Du, M. (2022) The Status of Chinese State-owned Enterprises in International Investment Arbitration: Much Ado about Nothing? Chinese Journal of International Law. Pp. 785–815. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmab040Hu, R. Assembling China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Discourse, Institution, and Materials. International Political Sociology. Vol. 18, Iss. 1. Pp. 1–25. DOI: 10.1093/ips/olae002Hu, R. Assembling China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Discourse, Institution, and Materials. International Political Sociology. Vol. 18, Iss. 1. Pp. 1–25. DOI: 10.1093/ips/olae002Nelson, D. (2021) How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria? US — Countervailing Measures (China) (21.5) World Trade Review. Pp. 556–565. DOI: 10.1017/S1474745621000215Nelson, D. (2021) How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria? US — Countervailing Measures (China) (21.5) World Trade Review. Pp. 556–565. DOI: 10.1017/S1474745621000215Parepa, L.-A. (2020) The Belt and Road Initiative as continuity in Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies. Pp. 175–201. DOI: 10.1080/24761028.2020.1848370Parepa, L.-A. (2020) The Belt and Road Initiative as continuity in Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies. Pp. 175–201. DOI: 10.1080/24761028.2020.1848370Zhang, Ch. (2019) How Much Do State-owned Enterprises Contribute to China’s GDP and Employment? DOI: 10.1596/32306Zhang, Ch. (2019) How Much Do State-owned Enterprises Contribute to China’s GDP and Employment? DOI: 10.1596/32306

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.